...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research >Comparison of conservative & aggressive management of PPROM at 34-36 weeks gestation in terms of development of neonatal sepsis & RDS
【24h】

Comparison of conservative & aggressive management of PPROM at 34-36 weeks gestation in terms of development of neonatal sepsis & RDS

机译:妊娠34-36周PPROM的保守治疗和积极治疗在新生儿败血症和RDS发展方面的比较

获取原文

摘要

Objective : To compare the conservative and aggressive management of Preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM) at 34-36 weeks gestation in terms of development of neonatal sepsis and respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Method : 194 pregnant women with PPROM at gestational age 34-36 weeks admitted in labour ward were included in the study conducted from 2009-2010 in department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, SMS Medical College, India.? Random allocation to conservative & aggressive management group was done by offering Chit Box Method assigning 97 cases in each group. In conservative management cases were hospitalised & provided bed rest, Daily fetal monitoring, Maternal vitals monitoring, Oral tab erythromycin 500 mg T.D.S for 7 days, Daily WBC count and c-reactive protein estimation. Expectant management was abandoned if there was clinical evidence of labour, infection or fetal distress. ? In aggressive management induction of labour was done by Tab Misoprostol 25 mg orally, at 4-6 hour intervals, for a maximum of 5 doses. Caesarean delivery was performed for standard obstetrical indication and for failed induction. ? After delivery neonatal care was provided by neonatologist. Results : Out of 97 cases in aggressive management group 4 (4.12%) newborn babies suffered from neonatal sepsis and out of 97 newborn babies in conservative management group 14 (14.43%) babies had neonatal sepsis. Out of 97 cases in aggressive management group 15 (15.46%) newborn suffered from RDS and out of 97 cases in conservative management group 12 (12.34%) newborn suffered from RDS. Conclusion : Rate of neonatal sepsis was higher in conservative management group than aggressive management group. Thus there was significant association observed for neonatal sepsis in between aggressive management and conservative management group. The rate of RDS was lower in conservative management group as compared to aggressive management group. But there is no significant association were observed between RDS in both conservative and aggressive management group.
机译:目的:比较新生儿败血症和呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS)的发生情况,在妊娠34-36周时比较保守和积极处理早产胎膜早破(PPROM)。方法:2009年至2010年在印度SMS医学院妇产科进行的研究中,纳入了194名在劳动病房中接受孕育的34〜36周胎龄PPROM孕妇。通过提供Chit Box方法(每组分配97个案例),将数据随机分配给保守和激进管理小组。在保守治疗病例中,住院并提供卧床休息,每日胎儿监测,母体生命监测,口服红霉素500 mg T.D.S,持续7天,每日白细胞计数和c反应蛋白估计。如果有人工,感染或胎儿窘迫的临床证据,则放弃预期管理。 ?在积极治疗中,使用Tab Misoprostol 25 mg口服引产,间隔4-6小时,最多5剂。进行剖腹产以用于标准的产科指征和失败的引产。 ?分娩后由新生儿科医生提供新生儿护理。结果:积极治疗组的97例新生儿中有4名(4.12%)新生儿败血症,保守治疗组的97例新生儿中有14例(14.43%)新生儿败血症。积极治疗组的97例中有15例(15.46%)新生儿患有RDS,保守治疗组的97例12例(12.34%)中的新生儿患有RDS。结论:保守治疗组新生儿败血症发生率高于积极治疗组。因此,在积极治疗组和保守治疗组之间观察到了新生儿败血症的显着关联。保守治疗组的RDS发生率低于积极治疗组。但是,保守治疗组和积极治疗组的RDS之间均未发现明显关联。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号