首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology >A prospective observational study on incidence of adverse drug reactions in a tertiary care teaching hospital: a pharmacovigilance study
【24h】

A prospective observational study on incidence of adverse drug reactions in a tertiary care teaching hospital: a pharmacovigilance study

机译:三级教学医院中药物不良反应发生率的前瞻性观察研究:药物警戒性研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Background: An adverse drug reaction (ADRs) is determined as response to a drug that is noxious unintended excludes therapeutic failures, overdose, drug abuse, noncompliance, and medication errors. The main aim of the study is to detect, understand and report ADR’S. Methods: This study is prospective observational study conducted for 6 months in in-patient setting in a tertiary care hospital. Naranjo’s, WHO causality scale, Siegel scale, Schumock and Thornton scale are used to assess ADR. Graph Pad Prism and SAS software’s are used. Results: Data was collected from a total of 1000 patients of which 121 (12.1%) patients were effected with 150 ADRs. Among 121 patients AdrAd was 60.66% and AdrIn was 39.33%. Of 121 patients 97 patients with single ADR, 28 patients with 2 ADRs, 10 patients were with three ADRs. ADR onset divides acute (10%), Latent (39%) and sub-acute (51%). ADR occurred are recovered (54%), Recovering (13%). Naranjos scale interprets definite (0.9%), probable (50.9%), possible (42.97%). According to WHO scale certain (2.7%), unlikely (2.7%), possible (38.84%). Hartwig and Siegel scale results are mild (12.4%), moderate (66.12%) and severe (12.4%). Schumock and Thornton preventability results are definitely (25.45%), probably (68.18%) and not preventable (6.36%). Conclusions: Every health care professional should be aware of the Pharmacovigilance principles and also should be aware of suspected ADR reporting form of PVPI. By applying the above scales it is easy for health care professionals to assess an ADR.
机译:背景:药物不良反应(ADR)被确定为对有害药物的反应,排除了治疗失败,用药过量,药物滥用,违规和用药错误。这项研究的主要目的是发现,理解和报告ADR。方法:本研究是前瞻性观察性研究,在三级医院的住院患者中进行了6个月。 Naranjo的,WHO因果关系量表,Siegel量表,Schumock和Thornton量表用于评估ADR。使用Graph Pad Prism和SAS软件。结果:收集了总共1000例患者的数据,其中121例(12.1%)患者接受了150种ADR。在121例患者中,AdrAd为60.66%,AdrIn为39.33%。在121例单一ADR患者,121例ADR患者,28例2 ADR患者,10例3 ADR患者中。 ADR发作分为急性(10%),潜在(39%)和亚急性(51%)。发生的ADR被恢复(54%),正在恢复(13%)。 Naranjos量表解释确定(0.9%),可能(50.9%),可能(42.97%)。根据世界卫生组织的规模,某些(2.7%),不太可能(2.7%),可能(38.84%)。 Hartwig和Siegel量表的结果为轻度(12.4%),中度(66.12%)和重度(12.4%)。 Schumock和Thornton的可预防性结果肯定是(25.45%),可能是(68.18%),并且是无法预防的(6.36%)。结论:每个卫生保健专业人员都应了解药物警戒原则,也应了解PVPI的可疑ADR报告形式。通过应用以上量表,医疗保健专业人员可以轻松评估ADR。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号