首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology >A comparative study of efficacy and safety of glucosamine plus chondroitin sulphate versus rosehip as add on therapy to NSAIDs in patients suffering from osteoarthritis
【24h】

A comparative study of efficacy and safety of glucosamine plus chondroitin sulphate versus rosehip as add on therapy to NSAIDs in patients suffering from osteoarthritis

机译:氨基葡萄糖加硫酸软骨素与玫瑰果联合应用NSAIDs治疗骨关节炎患者的疗效和安全性比较研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Osteoarthritis is a chronic and debilitating disease. Management of disease is a big challenge. NSAIDS play an important role but have many adverse reactions. So, this study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of natural compound rosehip versus glucosamine and chondroitin sulphate in patients of osteoarthritis. Methods: An open label, randomized, parallel group comparative study, conducted on patients of either sex with confirmed diagnosis of osteoarthritis on standard NSAIDs therapy, attending the outpatient department of orthopedics in a tertiary care centre. 150 patients were enrolled and divided into three groups (group A, group B and group C) of 50 each. Patients of group A were given Glucosamine plus chondroitin sulphate for 12 weeks. Group B was given rosehip for 12 weeks and group C placebo. These supplements were given as add on therapy. Patients were monitored and adverse drug reactions were noted. The data was analysed statistically using t- test for efficacy and descriptive stats for assessing the safety. Results: Efficacy was assessed by comparing mean reduction in the pain intensity between group A and B, group B gives highly significant results as compared to group A. While comparing joint tenderness, swelling around joint, mean functional capacity and improvement in the overall assessment, group B gives significant results as compared to group A. It was also observed that group A and group B were better than group C in all the efficacy parameters. All the drugs were well tolerated and systemically safe. Conclusions: There was significant difference in efficacy of rosehip compared with glaucosamine and chondroitin sulphate in patients of osteoarthritis. In comparison there was no significant difference in safety of two drugs and both were considered safe in patients.
机译:背景:骨关节炎是一种慢性衰弱性疾病。疾病的管理是一个巨大的挑战。 NSAIDS发挥重要作用,但有许多不良反应。因此,本研究旨在评估天然复合玫瑰果与葡萄糖胺和硫酸软骨素在骨关节炎患者中的疗效和安全性。方法:在标准NSAIDs治疗下对确诊患有骨关节炎的男女患者进行了一项开放标签,随机平行分组比较研究,该患者在三级护理中心的骨科门诊就诊。入组150例患者,分为三组(A组,B组和C组),每组50例。 A组患者给予葡萄糖胺加硫酸软骨素治疗12周。 B组给予玫瑰果12周,C组给予安慰剂。这些补充剂是作为补充疗法给予的。监测患者并注意药物不良反应。使用t检验对疗效进行统计学分析,并使用描述性统计数据评估安全性。结果:通过比较A组和B组疼痛强度的平均降低来评估疗效,B组与A组相比具有非常显着的结果。在比较关节压痛,关节周围肿胀,平均功能能力和总体评估的改善情况时, B组比A组有显着结果。还观察到A组和B组在所有功效参数上均优于C组。所有药物均具有良好的耐受性和系统安全性。结论:在骨关节炎患者中,玫瑰果的疗效与青草胺和硫酸软骨素相比有显着差异。相比之下,两种药物的安全性没有显着差异,并且两种药物都被认为对患者安全。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号