首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity >Evidence that women meeting physical activity guidelines do not sit less: An observational inclinometry study
【24h】

Evidence that women meeting physical activity guidelines do not sit less: An observational inclinometry study

机译:符合体育锻炼准则的女性坐着不少的证据:一项观察测斜仪研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background The inactivity physiology paradigm proposes that sedentary behaviors, including sitting too much, are independent of the type of physical activity delineated for health in the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. Thus, we hypothesized that, when accounting for behaviors across the entire day, variability in the amount of time spent sitting would be independent of the inter-and intra-individual time engaged in sustained moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). Methods Ninety-one healthy women, aged 40–75 years, completed a demographic questionnaire and assessment of height and weight. Participants wore the activPAL activity monitor for one week and time (minutes/day) spent sitting, standing, stepping, and in sustained bouts (bouts ≥10 minutes) of MVPA were quantified. The women were then stratified into groups based on weekly sustained MVPA. Additionally, each day of data collection for each participant was classified as either a “sufficient” MVPA day (≥ 30 min of MVPA) or an “insufficient” MVPA day for within-participant analyses. Results Time spent sitting, standing, and in incidental non-exercise stepping averaged 64, 28, and 11 hrs/week, respectively, and did not differ between groups with individuals meeting/exceeding the current exercise recommendation of 150 min/week of sustained MVPA in ≥10 minutes bouts (M = 294 min/week, SD = 22) compared to those with none or minimal levels (M= 20min/week, SD = 4). Time spent sitting (M = 9.1 hr/day, SD = 0.19 vs. M = 8.8 hr/day, SD = 0.22), standing (M = 3.9 hr/day, SD = 0.16 vs. M = 3.9 hr/day, SD = 0.15), and in intermittent stepping (M = 1.6 hr/day, SD = 0.07 vs. M = 1.6 hr/day, SD = 0.06) did not differ between days with (~55 min/day) and without recommended MVPA. Conclusions This study provides the first objective evidence that participation in sustained MVPA is unrelated to daily sitting duration in relatively healthy, middle and older-aged women. More research is needed to extend these findings to other populations and to inform distinct behavioral recommendations focused on sedentary time.
机译:背景非运动生理学范式提出,久坐行为,包括坐得过多,独立于《美国人身体活动指南》中为健康所描述的身体活动类型。因此,我们假设,当考虑一整天的行为时,坐着的时间量的变化将独立于从事持续中度到剧烈运动(MVPA)的个体间和个体内时间。方法九十一名40-75岁的健康妇女完成了一项人口统计学问卷并评估了身高和体重。参与者戴着activPAL活动监测仪一周,坐下,站立,踩踏和持续发作(发作≥10分钟)的MVPA时间(分钟/天)被量化。然后根据每周持续进行的MVPA将妇女分为几组。此外,每个参与者的每天数据收集被分类为参与者内部分析的“足够” MVPA天(≥30分钟MVPA)或“不足” MVPA天。结果坐,站和在非锻炼性踏步上花费的时间分别平均为每周64、28和11小时,并且在达到或超出当前建议的持续MVPA 150分钟/周的当前锻炼建议的组之间没有差异≥10分钟的比赛(M = 294分钟/周,SD = 22),而没有或最低水平的比赛(M = 20分钟/周,SD = 4)。坐着的时间(M = 9.1小时/天,SD = 0.19 vs. M = 8.8小时/天,SD = 0.22),站立时间(M = 3.9小时/天,SD = 0.16 vs. M = 3.9小时/天,SD = 0.15),并且在间歇步进(M = 1.6小时/天,SD = 0.07与M = 1.6小时/天,SD = 0.06)之间,有(〜55分钟/天)和无推荐MVPA的日子之间没有差异。结论这项研究提供了第一个客观证据,表明在相对健康的中年和老年妇女中,持续的MVPA参与与每日就座时间无关。需要更多的研究来将这些发现扩展到其他人群,并告知针对久坐时间的独特行为建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号