...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology >Perception of doctors towards Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR) reporting: a cross sectional survey using a validated questionnaire
【24h】

Perception of doctors towards Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR) reporting: a cross sectional survey using a validated questionnaire

机译:医生对药物不良反应(ADR)报告的看法:使用经过验证的问卷调查进行横断面调查

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Several studies have shown lack of sufficient knowledge and awareness among doctors on ADR reporting. Knowledge and attitude of doctors about ADR greatly influences extent of reporting. Identifying factors affecting ADR-reporting is vital to enable Pharmacovigilance teams to implement interventions to enhance rate and quality of reporting of ADRs. Hence, this study is done to evaluate perceptions of doctors towards ADR-reporting and to determine barriers for reporting ADR. Methods: Cross sectional study conducted among doctors using a validated questionnaire to assess knowledge, attitude, practice and barriers for reporting ADRs. The questionnaire captured the demographic details, knowledge (14), attitudes (7) and practice pattern (4) towards pharmacovigilance. Descriptive statistics was used to assess the response among doctors. Results: Of 157 doctors who responded to questionnaire, 90% of doctors were aware of pharmacovigilance program mainly through PVG activities by AMC and pharmacology classes. Only 47% doctors reported ADRs. The composite score on knowledge of ADR reporting and on knowledge of ADR burden was found to be moderate. 90% doctors opined ADR monitoring in hospital should be mandatory. 83% doctors opined ADR reporting by one person can make significant difference to community. One-third doctors felt there should be financial reward for ADR-reporting. In suspected cases, 57% doctors include ADR as differential diagnosis. 61% doctors said they will document ADR in patient file and 78% reports to AMC. More than one-third doctors don’t know where and how to report ADR. One-third doctors felt management of patients was more important than reporting ADR. Nearly one-fourth didn’t report fearing legal liabilities, difficulty diagnosing ADR and negative impact on doctors. Conclusions: Knowledge about ADR-reporting and attitude towards it is adequate. But, because of many barriers, actual practice of ADR-reporting is unsatisfactory. Hence, Pharmacovigilance training is essential for doctors to promote and improve ADR-reporting.
机译:背景:多项研究表明,医生对ADR报告缺乏足够的知识和认识。医生对ADR的了解和态度在很大程度上影响了报告的范围。识别影响ADR报告的因素对于使药物警戒小组能够实施干预措施以提高ADR报告的速度和质量至关重要。因此,本研究旨在评估医生对ADR报告的看法,并确定报告ADR的障碍。方法:使用经过验证的问卷在医生之间进行横断面研究,以评估报告ADR的知识,态度,实践和障碍。该问卷收集了有关药物警戒的人口统计学细节,知识(14),态度(7)和实践模式(4)。描述性统计用于评估医生的反应。结果:在回答问卷的157位医生中,90%的医生主要通过AMC的PVG活动和药理课了解药物警戒方案。只有47%的医生报告了ADR。发现关于ADR报告知识和ADR负担知识的综合评分中等。 90%的医生认为必须在医院进行ADR监测。 83%的医生认为由一个人进行ADR报告可以对社区产生重大影响。三分之一的医生认为,进行ADR报告应该有经济上的回报。在可疑病例中,有57%的医生将ADR用作鉴别诊断。 61%的医生说,他们将在患者档案中记录ADR,78%的人向AMC报告。超过三分之一的医生不知道在哪里以及如何报告ADR。三分之一的医生认为对患者的管理比报告ADR更为重要。几乎有四分之一的人没有报告担心法律责任,诊断ADR的困难和对医生的负面影响。结论:关于ADR报告及其态度的知识是足够的。但是,由于许多障碍,ADR报告的实际做法并不令人满意。因此,药物警戒培训对于医生促进和改善ADR报告至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号