首页> 外文期刊>International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences >EXPLORING SCHEMA MATCHING TO COMPARE GEOSPATIAL STANDARDS: APPLICATION TO UNDERGROUND UTILITY NETWORKS
【24h】

EXPLORING SCHEMA MATCHING TO COMPARE GEOSPATIAL STANDARDS: APPLICATION TO UNDERGROUND UTILITY NETWORKS

机译:探索模式匹配以比较地理空间标准:在地下公用网络中的应用

获取原文
       

摘要

This paper proposes a preliminary analysis of whether a schema matching approach can be applied for the comparison and possible the selection of geospatial standards. Schema matching is tested in the context of underground utility network modelling and, as an initial experiment, three geospatial standards are compared with user requirements: CityGML UtilityNetwork ADE, infraGML and IFC. The schema comparison is enabled by XSD files, and carried out from syntactic, structural and semantic points of view, making use of existing software. The findings of this preliminary investigation show that schema matching is applicable for the comparison of user needs and existing geospatial standards, and does show some potential, but the matching results are varied and not easy to interpret. In particular, the similarity scores between user needs and standards are very low and the comparison and the selection is not straightforward. Having a strategy - an iterative process - is required. While for this preliminary examination, the focus of this paper is on assessing the schema matching approach (which parameters to take into consideration, how to proceed, tools available, automation aspect), further work will include examining software options and performance, as well as exploring how to take the relatively complex preliminary results obtained here and use them to assist the selection of a specific standard.
机译:本文对模式匹配方法是否可用于比较以及是否可能选择地理空间标准提出了初步分析。在地下公用事业网络建模的环境中测试了模式匹配,并且作为初始实验,将三种地理空间标准与用户需求进行了比较:CityGML UtilityNetwork ADE,infraGML和IFC。模式比较由XSD文件启用,并使用现有软件从语法,结构和语义的角度进行。初步调查的结果表明,模式匹配适用于用户需求和现有地理空间标准的比较,并且确实显示出一定的潜力,但是匹配结果是多种多样的并且不容易解释。特别是,用户需求和标准之间的相似性分数非常低,并且比较和选择并不简单。需要制定策略(一个迭代过程)。在进行此初步检查时,本文的重点是评估模式匹配方法(要考虑哪些参数,如何进行,可用工具,自动化方面),进一步的工作将包括检查软件选项和性能以及探索如何获取此处获得的相对复杂的初步结果,并将其用于协助选择特定标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号