首页> 外文期刊>Interactive Journal of Medical Research >Validity and Usability of Low-Cost Accelerometers for Internet-Based Self-Monitoring of Physical Activity in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
【24h】

Validity and Usability of Low-Cost Accelerometers for Internet-Based Self-Monitoring of Physical Activity in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

机译:低成本加速度计用于基于互联网的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者身体活动自我监测的有效性和可用性

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background The importance of regular physical activity for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is well-established. However, many patients do not meet the recommended daily amount. Accelerometers might provide patients with the information needed to increase physical activity in daily life. Objective Our objective was to assess the validity and usability of low-cost Internet-connected accelerometers. Furthermore we explored patients’ preferences with regards to the presentation of and feedback on monitored physical activity. Methods To assess concurrent validity we conducted a field validation study with patients who wore two low-cost accelerometers, Fitbit and Physical Activity Monitor (PAM), at the same time along with a sophisticated multisensor accelerometer (SenseWear Armband) for 48 hours. Data on energy expenditure assessed from registrations from the two low-cost accelerometers were compared to the well validated SenseWear Armband which served as a reference criterion. Usability was examined in a cross-over study with patients who, in succession, wore the Fitbit and the PAM for 7 consecutive days and filled out a 16 item questionnaire with regards to the use of the corresponding device Results The agreement between energy expenditure (METs) from the SenseWear Armband with METs estimated by the Fitbit and PAM was good ( r =.77) and moderate ( r =.41), respectively. The regression model that was developed for the Fitbit explained 92% whereas the PAM-model could explain 89% of total variance in METs measured by the SenseWear. With regards to the usability, both the Fitbit and PAM were well rated on all items. There were no significant differences between the two devices. Conclusions The low-cost Fitbit and PAM are valid and usable devices to measure physical activity in patients with COPD. These devices may be useful in long-term interventions aiming at increasing physical activity levels in these patients.
机译:背景技术对于慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者进行定期体育锻炼的重要性已得到公认。但是,许多患者未达到建议的每日用量。加速度计可能会为患者提供增加日常生活中的运动所需的信息。目的我们的目的是评估低成本的互联网加速度传感器的有效性和可用性。此外,我们探讨了患者对所监测身体活动的表现和反馈的偏好。方法为了评估并发有效性,我们对同时佩戴两个低成本加速度计,Fitbit和身体活动监测器(PAM)以及复杂的多传感器加速度计(SenseWear Armband)的患者进行了48小时的现场验证研究。将来自两个低成本加速度计的注册所评估的能源消耗数据与经过充分验证的SenseWear臂章进行比较,该臂章可作为参考标准。在一项交叉研究中检查了可用性,该研究连续7天连续佩戴Fitbit和PAM,并填写了16项关于使用相应设备的问卷。结果能量消耗(METs)之间的一致性由Fitbit和PAM估算的MET值来自SenseWear臂章,分别为好(r = .77)和中等(r = .41)。为Fitbit开发的回归模型可以解释92%,而PAM模型可以解释SenseWear测量的MET总方差的89%。关于可用性,Fitbit和PAM在所有项目上均获得良好的评价。两种设备之间没有显着差异。结论低成本的Fitbit和PAM是测量COPD患者身体活动的有效且可用的设备。这些设备可能在旨在增加这些患者身体活动水平的长期干预中有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号