首页> 外文期刊>Indian Journal of Ophthalmology >Converting a conventional wired-halogen illuminated indirect ophthalmoscope to a wireless-light emitting diode illuminated indirect ophthalmoscope in less than 1000/- rupees
【24h】

Converting a conventional wired-halogen illuminated indirect ophthalmoscope to a wireless-light emitting diode illuminated indirect ophthalmoscope in less than 1000/- rupees

机译:将传统的有线卤素照明间接检眼镜转换为无线发光二极管照明间接检眼镜的成本低于1000卢比

获取原文
       

摘要

Aim:To report the “do it yourself” method of converting an existing wired-halogen indirect ophthalmoscope (IO) to a wireless-light emitting diode (LED) IO and report the preferences of the patients and the ophthalmologists.Subjects and Methods:In this prospective observational study, a conventional IO was converted to wireless-LED IO using easily available, affordable electrical components. Conventional and the converted IO were then used to perform photo-stress test and take the feedback of subjects and the ophthalmologists regarding its handling and illumination characteristics.Results:The cost of conversion to wireless-LED was 815/- rupees. Twenty-nine subjects, mean age 34.3 ± 10 years with normal eyes were recruited in the study. Between the two illumination systems, there was no statistical difference in the magnitude of the visual acuity loss and the time to recovery of acuity and the bleached vision on photo-stress test, although the visual recovery was clinically faster with LED illumination. The heat sensation was more with halogen illumination than the LED (P = 0.009). The ophthalmologists rated wireless-LED IO higher than wired-halogen IO on the handling, examination comfort, patient's visual comfort and quality of the image. Twenty-two (81%) ophthalmologists wanted to change over to wireless-LED IO.Conclusions:Converting to wireless-LED IO is easy, cost-effective and preferred over a wired-halogen indirect ophthalmoscope.
机译:目的:报告将现有的有线卤素间接检眼镜(IO)转换为无线发光二极管(LED)IO的“自己动手”的方法,并报告患者和眼科医生的喜好。在这项前瞻性观察性研究中,使用易于获得且价格合理的电子组件将常规IO转换为无线LED IO。然后,使用常规的和转换后的IO进行光压力测试,并获得受试者和眼科医生关于其处理和照明特性的反馈。结果:转换为无线LED的成本为815 /卢比。该研究招募了29名平均眼睛正常年龄34.3±10岁的受试者。在两个照明系统之间,视力丧失的幅度以及恢复光敏度的时间以及光应力测试中视力衰退的时间没有统计学差异,尽管在临床上使用LED照明可以更快地恢复视力。卤素灯照明比LED更具热感(P = 0.009)。眼科医生在操作,检查舒适度,患者的视觉舒适度和图像质量方面将无线LED IO评为高于有线卤素IO。有22位(81%)的眼科医生希望转换为无线LED IO。结论:与有线卤素间接检眼镜相比,转换为无线LED IO更加容易,具有成本效益并且是首选。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号