首页> 外文期刊>Indian Journal of Ophthalmology >Preferred clinical practice in convergence insufficiency in India: A survey
【24h】

Preferred clinical practice in convergence insufficiency in India: A survey

机译:印度收敛性供血不足的首选临床实践:一项调查

获取原文
           

摘要

PurposeConvergence insufficiency (CI) is a common binocular vision disorder. However, there is a lackof consensus regarding the treatment most appropriate for CI. The aim of the study was to investigate thetreatment for CI by surveying the ophthalmologists regarding the most common treatment modalities usedin India.Materials and Methods:Four hundred questionnaires were distributed amongst ophthalmologists attendingdifferent sessions of the Delhi Ophthalmological Society annual conference held in April 2007. Two hundredand three ophthalmologists responded (response rate 50.75%). The responders included 109 privatepractitioners, 57 consultants attached to teaching institutes and 37 residents.Results:The majority of ophthalmologists (66.7%) claimed encountering >5% outpatient departmentpatients with CI. Pencil push-ups therapy (PPT) was the most common first line of treatment offeredby ophthalmologists (79%) followed by synoptophore exercises (18%). Only 3% referred the patients tooptometrists. Thirty per cent ophthalmologists claimed good results with PPT, which was significantly higherin private practitioners (35%). Only 26% ophthalmologists explained physiological diplopia to patients ona regular basis and reported significantly higher percentage of patients (46.3%) with good results. Only12.3% ophthalmologists needed to refer >30% patients for synoptophore exercises. For failure of PPT 86.7%considered lack of compliance as the major reason as perceived by ophthalmologists.Conclusions:This survey suggested that most ophthalmic practitioners prescribed PPT as the initial treatmentfor CI and had satisfactory results with PPT. The majority of the practitioners did not explain to the patientabout physiological diplopia. Explaining physiological diplopia may improve outcome, as perceived fromthe survey.
机译:目的融合不足(CI)是一种常见的双眼视力障碍。但是,关于最适合CI的治疗尚缺乏共识。该研究的目的是通过就印度最常用的治疗方式对眼科医生进行调查来研究CI的治疗方法。材料与方法:向参加2007年4月举行的德里眼科学会年会的不同会议的眼科医生分发了四百份问卷。一百零三位眼科医生作出了回应(回应率50.75%)。回应者包括109名私人执业者,57位教学机构的顾问和37位居民。结果:大多数眼科医生(66.7%)声称遇到超过5%的门诊患者患有CI。铅笔俯卧撑疗法(PPT)是眼科医生提供的最常见的一线治疗方法(79%),其次是斜视锻炼(18%)。只有3%的患者将患者推荐给眼科医生。 30%的眼科医生声称PPT取得了良好的效果,私人执业医师的PPT效果显着更高(35%)。只有26%的眼科医生会定期向患者解释生理性复视,并报告患者比例明显更高(46.3%),效果良好。只有12.3%的眼科医生需要转诊> 30%的患者进行滑膜运动。对于PPT的失败,有86.7%的患者认为依从性不佳是眼科医生认为的主要原因。结论:该调查表明,大多数眼科医师都将PPT作为CI的初始治疗方法,并获得满意的PPT结果。大多数从业者没有向患者解释生理复视。从调查中可以看出,解释生理性复视可能会改善结局。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号