首页> 外文期刊>Indian journal of orthopaedics >A comparative study of pedicle screw fixation in dorsolumbar spine by freehand versus image-assisted technique: A cadaveric study
【24h】

A comparative study of pedicle screw fixation in dorsolumbar spine by freehand versus image-assisted technique: A cadaveric study

机译:徒手与图像辅助技术比较椎弓根椎弓根螺钉固定的比较研究:尸体研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Background: New and expensive technology such as three-dimensional computer assisted surgery is being used for pedicle screw fixation in dorsolumbar spine. Their availability, expenses and amount of radiation exposure are issues in a developing country. On the contrary, freehand technique of pedicle screw placement utilizes anatomic landmarks and tactile palpation without fluoroscopy or navigation to place pedicle screws. The purpose of this study was to analyze and compare the accuracy of freehand and image-assisted technique to place pedicle screws in the dorsolumbar spine of cadavers by an experienced surgeon and a resident. Evaluation was done using dissection of pedicle and computed tomography (CT) imaging. Materials and Methods: Ten cadaveric dorsolumbar spines were exposed by a posterior approach. Titanium pedicle screws were inserted from D5 to L5 vertebrae by freehand and image-assisted technique on either side by an experienced surgeon and a resident. CT was obtained. A blinded radiologist reviewed the imaging. The spines were then dissected to do a macroscopic examination. Screws, having evidence of cortical perforation of more than 2 mm on CT, were considered to be a significant breach. Results: A total of 260 pedicle screws were placed. The surgeon and the resident placed 130 screws each. Out of 130 screws, both of them placed 65 screws each by freehand and image- assisted technique each. The resident had a rate of 7.69% significant medial and 10.76% significant lateral breach with freehand technique while with image-assisted had a rate of 3.07% significant medial and 9.23% significant lateral breach. The expert surgeon had a rate of 6.15% significant medial and 1.53% significant lateral breach with freehand technique while with image-assisted had a rate of 3.07% significant medial and 6.15% significant lateral breach on CT evaluation. Conclusion: Freehand technique is as good as the image-assisted technique. Under appropriate supervision, residents can safely learn to place freehand pedicle screws with an acceptable violation rate.
机译:背景:新的和昂贵的技术,例如三维计算机辅助手术,正被用于在背脊柱椎弓根中进行椎弓根螺钉固定。它们的可用性,费用和辐射暴露量是发展中国家的问题。相反,徒手操作椎弓根螺钉的技术是利用解剖学界标和触觉触诊,而无需进行透视检查或导航来放置椎弓根螺钉。这项研究的目的是分析和比较徒手和图像辅助技术的准确性,该技术是由经验丰富的外科医生和住院医师将椎弓根螺钉放置在尸体的背sol骨脊柱中。使用椎弓根解剖和计算机断层扫描(CT)成像进行评估。材料和方法:通过后路入路暴露十具尸体背脊骨脊柱。经验丰富的外科医生和住院医师通过徒手和图像辅助技术,将钛合金椎弓根螺钉从D5插入L5椎骨。获得了CT。一位瞎子的放射科医生检查了成像。然后解剖刺进行宏观检查。在CT上有皮质穿孔大于2 mm的证据的螺钉被认为是重大破坏。结果:总共放置了260个椎弓根螺钉。外科医生和住院医师各放置130颗螺钉。在130颗螺钉中,他们各自通过徒手和图像辅助技术分别放置了65颗螺钉。居民使用徒手技术的内侧显着率为7.69%,外侧显着率为10.76%,而在图像辅助下,内侧显着率为3.07%,外侧显着率为9.23%。徒手技术在徒手技术上的内侧显着率为6.15%,外侧显着率为1.53%,而在影像辅助下,CT评估的内侧显着率为3.07%,外侧显着率为6.15%。结论:徒手技术与图像辅助技术一样好。在适当的监督下,居民可以安全地学习以可接受的违规率放置徒手椎弓根螺钉。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号