首页> 外文期刊>Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine >Comparison of patient-ventilator asynchrony during pressure support ventilation and proportional assist ventilation modes in surgical Intensive Care Unit: A randomized crossover study
【24h】

Comparison of patient-ventilator asynchrony during pressure support ventilation and proportional assist ventilation modes in surgical Intensive Care Unit: A randomized crossover study

机译:外科重症监护室压力支持通气和比例辅助通气模式下患者-呼吸机异步的比较:一项随机交叉研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Background: The patient-ventilator asynchrony is almost observed in all modes of ventilation, and this asynchrony affects lung mechanics adversely resulting in deleterious outcome. Innovations and advances in ventilator technology have been trying to overcome this problem by designing newer modes of ventilation. Pressure support ventilation (PSV) is a commonly used flow-cycled mode where a constant pressure is delivered by ventilator. Proportional assist ventilation (PAV) is a new dynamic inspiratory pressure assistance and is supposed to be better than PSV for synchrony and tolerance, but reports are still controversial. Moreover, most of these studies are conducted in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with respiratory failure; the results of these studies may not be applicable to surgical patients. Thus, we proposed to do compare these two modes in surgical Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients as a randomized crossover study. Aims: Comparison of patient-ventilator asynchrony between PSV and PAV plus (PAV+) in surgical patients while weaning. Subjects and Methods: After approval by the Hospital Ethics Committee, we enrolled twenty patients from surgical ICU of tertiary care institute. The patients were ventilated with pressure support mode (PSV) and PAV+ for 12 h as a crossover from one mode to another after 6 h while weaning. Results: Average age and weight of patients were 41.80 ± 15.20 years (mean ± standard deviation [SD]) and 66.50 ± 12.47 (mean ± SD) kg, respectively. Comparing the asynchronies between the two modes, the mean number of total asynchronous recorded breaths in PSV was 7.05 ± 0.83 and 4.35 ± 5.62, respectively, during sleep and awake state, while the same were 6.75 ± 112.24 and 10.85 ± 11.33 in PAV+. Conclusion: Both PSV and PAV+ modes of ventilation performed similarly for patient-ventilator synchrony in surgical patients. In surgical patients with acute respiratory failure, dynamic inspiratory pressure assistance modalities are not superior to PSV with respect to cardiorespiratory function.
机译:背景:在所有通气模式中几乎都观察到了患者-呼吸机的不同步,这种不同步对肺部力学产生了不利影响,从而导致有害的结果。通风机技术的创新和进步一直在尝试通过设计更新的通风方式来克服这一问题。压力支持通气(PSV)是一种常用的流循环模式,其中通气机提供恒定压力。比例辅助通气(PAV)是一种新型的动态吸气压力辅助系统,在同步性和耐受性方面应该比PSV更好,但报告仍存在争议。而且,这些研究大多数是在患有呼吸衰竭的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中进行的。这些研究的结果可能不适用于手术患者。因此,我们建议在外科重症监护病房(ICU)患者中比较这两种模式,作为一项随机交叉研究。目的:比较断奶时手术患者的PSV和PAV plus(PAV +)之间的呼吸机异步。对象和方法:经医院伦理委员会批准,我们招募了来自三级医疗机构外科重症监护病房的20名患者。断奶6小时后,患者采用压力支持模式(PSV)和PAV +进行通气12 h,从一种模式转换为另一种模式。结果:患者的平均年龄和体重分别为41.80±15.20岁(平均±标准差[SD])和66.50±12.47(平均±SD)kg。比较这两种模式之间的异步性,在睡眠和清醒状态下,PSV中记录的总异步呼吸平均数分别为7.05±0.83和4.35±5.62,而PAV +中分别为6.75±112.24和10.85±11.33。结论:PSV和PAV +通气方式在外科患者中的通气同步性上相似。在患有急性呼吸衰竭的外科手术患者中,就心肺功能而言,动态吸气压力辅助方式并不优于PSV。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号