首页> 外文期刊>Imaging Science in Dentistry >Accuracy of digital periapical radiography and cone-beam computed tomography in detecting external root resorption
【24h】

Accuracy of digital periapical radiography and cone-beam computed tomography in detecting external root resorption

机译:数字根尖放射照相和锥形束计算机断层扫描在检测外部根吸收中的准确性

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and digital intraoral radiography in diagnosing simulated small external root resorption cavities. Materials and Methods Cavities were drilled in 159 roots using a small spherical bur at different root levels and on all surfaces. The teeth were imaged both with intraoral digital radiography using image plates and with CBCT. Two sets of intraoral images were acquired per tooth: orthogonal (PA) which was the conventional periapical radiograph and mesioangulated (SET). Four readers were asked to rate their confidence level in detecting and locating the lesions. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to assess the accuracy of each modality in detecting the presence of lesions, the affected surface, and the affected level. Analysis of variation was used to compare the results and kappa analysis was used to evaluate interobserver agreement. Results A significant difference in the area under the ROC curves was found among the three modalities (P=0.0002), with CBCT (0.81) having a significantly higher value than PA (0.71) or SET (0.71). PA was slightly more accurate than SET, but the difference was not statistically significant. CBCT was also superior in locating the affected surface and level. Conclusion CBCT has already proven its superiority in detecting multiple dental conditions, and this study shows it to likewise be superior in detecting and locating incipient external root resorption.
机译:目的这项研究的目的是评估和比较锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)和数字口腔造影在诊断模拟小的外部牙根吸收腔中的功效。材料和方法使用小球形钻在不同根部水平和所有表面上钻159个根部中的空腔。通过使用成像板的口腔内数字射线照相术和CBCT对牙齿成像。每个牙齿获取两组口腔内图像:正交(PA)是常规的根尖周放射照片,而中角(SET)。要求四位读者对他们在检测和定位病变中的置信度进行评分。进行受试者工作特征(ROC)分析,以评估每种方法在检测病变,受累表面和受累水平方面的准确性。变异分析用于比较结果,而kappa分析用于评估观察者之间的一致性。结果在三种模态之间,ROC曲线下的面积存在显着差异(P = 0.0002),其中CBCT(0.81)的值显着高于PA(0.71)或SET(0.71)。 PA的准确度略高于SET,但差异无统计学意义。 CBCT在定位受影响的表面和水平方面也很出色。结论CBCT已经证明了其在检测多种牙齿状况方面的优越性,并且这项研究表明CBCT在检测和定位初期外部牙根吸收方面同样具有优越性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号