首页> 外文期刊>Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal >Risk and Return in Hedge Funds and Funds-of-Hedge Funds: A Cross-Sectional Approach
【24h】

Risk and Return in Hedge Funds and Funds-of-Hedge Funds: A Cross-Sectional Approach

机译:对冲基金和对冲基金的风险与回报:跨部门方法

获取原文
       

摘要

The objective of this study is to examine whether the available data on individual hedge funds (HFs) and funds-of-hedge funds (FOHFs) can reveal the risk-return trade-off and, if so, to find an appropriate risk measure that captures the cross-sectional variation in HF and FOHF returns and compare the risk-return relationship in HFs and FOHFs. Using the “live funds” and the “dead funds” datasets provided by Hedge Fund Research Inc. (HFR), we concentrate on alternative risk measures such as semi-deviation, VaR, expected shortfall and tail risk and compare them with standard deviation in terms of their ability to describe the cross-sectional variation in expected returns of HFs and FOHFs. Firstly, the risk measures are analysed at the portfolio level of HFs and FOHFs by adopting the Fama and French (1992) approach. Secondly, the various estimated risk measures are compared at the individual HF and FOHF levels by using univariate and multivariate cross-sectional regressions. The results show that the available data on HFs and FOHFs exhibits different risk-return trade-offs. The Cornish-Fisher expected shortfall or Cornish-Fisher tail risk could be an appropriate risk measure for HF return. Although appropriate alternative risk measures for the HFs are found, it is difficult to determine the risk measures that best capture the cross-sectional variation in FOHF returns.
机译:这项研究的目的是检查有关单个对冲基金(HFs)和对冲基金(FOHFs)的可用数据是否可以揭示风险与收益之间的权衡关系,如果可以,找到合适的风险衡量标准捕获HF和FOHF收益率的横截面变化,并比较HF和FOHF的风险收益关系。使用对冲基金研究公司(HFR)提供的“实物基金”和“死基金”数据集,我们专注于半风险,VaR,预期空头和尾部风险等替代风险度量,并将它们与标准偏差进行比较。它们描述HF和FOHF预期收益的横截面变化的能力的术语。首先,通过采用Fama and French(1992)方法在HF和FOHF的投资组合层面分析风险衡量。其次,通过使用单变量和多变量横截面回归比较各个HF和FOHF水平下的各种估计风险度量。结果表明,有关HF和FOHF的可用数据表现出不同的风险收益权衡。康沃尔-费舍尔预期的空缺或康沃尔-费舍尔尾部风险可能是HF返回的适当风险度量。尽管找到了适用于HF的适当替代风险衡量方法,但很难确定能最好地捕捉FOHF回报率横截面变化的风险衡量方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号