...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of laboratory medicine. >Direct Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Bacteria From Positive Blood Culture Bottles by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry and the Vitek 2 System
【24h】

Direct Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Bacteria From Positive Blood Culture Bottles by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry and the Vitek 2 System

机译:通过基质辅助激光解吸/电离飞行时间质谱和Vitek 2系统直接鉴定和鉴定阳性血液培养瓶中细菌的药敏性

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: We evaluated the reliability and accuracy of the combined use of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) bacterial identification and Vitek 2 antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) for bacteria from positive blood culture bottles. Methods: Direct identification and AST were performed in parallel to the standard methods in monomicrobial positive blood culture bottles. In total, 254 isolates grown on aerobic and/or anaerobic bottles were identified with MALDI-TOF Vitek MS (bioMérieux, France), and 1,978 microorganism/antimicrobial agent combinations were assessed. For isolates from anaerobic bottles, an aliquot of the culture broth was centrifuged, washed, and filtered through a nylon mesh. For isolates from aerobic/pediatric bottles, a lysis step using 9.26% ammonium chloride solution and 2% saponin solution was included. Results: The overall correct identification rate was 81.8% (208/254) and that for gram-positive/gram-negative isolates was 73.9%/92.6%, respectively, and it was 81.8%, 87.6%, and 57.9% for isolates from aerobic, anaerobic, and pediatric bottles, respectively. Identification was not possible in 45 cases, and most of these isolates were streptococci (N=14) and coagulase-negative staphylococci (N=11). Misidentification occurred only in one case. Compared with standard methods, direct AST showed 97.9% (1,936/1,978) agreement with very major error of 0.25%, major error of 0.05%, and minor error of 1.8%. Conclusions: This simple and cost-effective sample preparation method gives reliable results for the direct identification and AST of bacteria. For the identification of streptococci and coagulase-negative staphylococci, the method should be further improved.
机译:背景:我们评估了结合使用基质辅助激光解吸/电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF MS)细菌鉴定和Vitek 2抗菌药敏试验(AST)对血液培养阳性细菌的可靠性和准确性。瓶。方法:在单菌阳性血液培养瓶中,与标准方法并行进行直接鉴定和AST。总共,用MALDI-TOF Vitek MS(法国bioMérieux)鉴定了在需氧和/或厌氧瓶上生长的254种分离株,并评估了1,978种微生物/抗菌剂组合。对于来自厌氧瓶的分离物,将培养液的等分试样离心,洗涤并通过尼龙网过滤。对于需氧/儿科瓶的分离物,包括使用9.26%氯化铵溶液和2%皂苷溶液的裂解步骤。结果:总体正确识别率为81.8%(208/254),革兰氏阳性/革兰氏阴性分离株的正确识别率分别为73.9%/ 92.6%,而来自革兰氏阳性菌的分离物的正确识别率分别为81.8%,87.6%和57.9%。有氧,无氧和小儿瓶。在45例病例中无法进行鉴定,并且大多数分离株是链球菌(N = 14)和凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(N = 11)。错误识别仅在一种情况下发生。与标准方法相比,直接AST显示97.9%(1,936 / 1,978)一致性,非常大的误差为0.25%,主要的误差为0.05%,较小的误差为1.8%。结论:这种简单且经济高效的样品制备方法可为直接鉴定和AST细菌提供可靠的结果。为了鉴定链球菌和凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌,应进一步改进该方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号