首页> 外文期刊>Annals of laboratory medicine. >Comparing Results of Five Glomerular Filtration Rate-Estimating Equations in the Korean General Population: MDRD Study, Revised Lund-Malm?, and Three CKD-EPI Equations
【24h】

Comparing Results of Five Glomerular Filtration Rate-Estimating Equations in the Korean General Population: MDRD Study, Revised Lund-Malm?, and Three CKD-EPI Equations

机译:韩国总人口中五个肾小球滤过率估计方程的比较结果:MDRD研究,修正的Lund-Malm?和三个CKD-EPI方程

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is a widely used index of kidney function. Recently, new formulas such as the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations or the Lund-Malm? equation were introduced for assessing eGFR. We compared them with the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study equation in the Korean adult population. Methods: The study population comprised 1,482 individuals (median age 51 [42-59] yr, 48.9% males) who received annual physical check-ups during the year 2014. Serum creatinine (Cr) and cystatin C (CysC) were measured. We conducted a retrospective analysis using five GFR estimating equations (MDRD Study, revised Lund-Malm?, and Cr and/or CysC-based CKD-EPI equations). Reduced GFR was defined as eGFR 2 . Results: For the GFR category distribution, large discrepancies were observed depending on the equation used; category G1 (≥90 mL/min/1.73 m sup style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Dotum, Gulim, verdana, helvetica, arial, sans-serif;"2 ) ranged from 7.4-81.8%. Compared with the MDRD Study equation, the other four equations overestimated GFR, and CysC-based equations showed a greater difference (-31.3 for CKD-EPI sub style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Dotum, Gulim, verdana, helvetica, arial, sans-serif;"CysC and -20.5 for CKD-EPI sub style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Dotum, Gulim, verdana, helvetica, arial, sans-serif;"Cr-CysC ). CysC-based equations decreased the prevalence of reduced GFR by one third (9.4% in the MDRD Study and 2.4% in CKD-EPI sub style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Dotum, Gulim, verdana, helvetica, arial, sans-serif;"CysC ). Conclusions: Our data shows that there are remarkable differences in eGFR assessment in the Korean population depending on the equation used, especially in normal or mildly decreased categories. Further prospective studies are necessary in various clinical settings.
机译:背景:肾小球滤过率估计值(eGFR)是肾功能广泛使用的指标。最近,新的公式,例如慢性肾脏病流行病学协作(CKD-EPI)方程或Lund-Malm?引入方程来评估eGFR。我们将它们与韩国成年人口中的肾脏疾病饮食调整(MDRD)研究方程进行了比较。方法:该研究人群包括2014年接受年度身体检查的1482人(中位年龄51 [42-59]岁,男性48.9%)。测量了血清肌酐(Cr)和胱抑素C(CysC)。我们使用五个GFR估计方程式(MDRD研究,修订的Lund-Malm?以及基于Cr和/或CysC的CKD-EPI方程式)进行了回顾性分析。降低的GFR定义为eGFR 2。结果:对于GFR类别分布,根据所使用的方程式,观察到较大的差异。类别G1(≥90mL / min / 1.73 m 2)从7.4-81.8%。与MDRD研究方程相比,其他四个方程高估了GFR,而基于CysC的方程则显示出更大的差异(对于CKD-EPI 对于CKD-EPI Cr-CysC)。基于CysC的方程式将降低的GFR的患病率降低了三分之一(MDRD研究中为9.4%,CKD-EPI中为2.4% CysC)。结论:我们的数据表明,根据所使用的方程,韩国人群的eGFR评估存在显着差异,尤其是在正常人群或轻度降低人群中。在各种临床环境中,有必要进行进一步的前瞻性研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号