首页> 外文期刊>Annals of laboratory medicine. >Comparison of the Bruker Biotyper and VITEK MS Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry Systems Using a Formic Acid Extraction Method to Identify Common and Uncommon Yeast Isolates
【24h】

Comparison of the Bruker Biotyper and VITEK MS Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry Systems Using a Formic Acid Extraction Method to Identify Common and Uncommon Yeast Isolates

机译:使用甲酸提取方法鉴定常见和不常见的酵母菌分离物的Bruker Biotyper和VITEK MS基质辅助激光解吸/电离飞行时间质谱系统的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) allows rapid and accurate identification of clinical yeast isolates. In-tube formic acid/acetonitrile (FA/ACN) extraction is recommended prior to the analysis with MALDI Biotyper, but the direct on-plate FA extraction is simpler. We compared the Biotyper with the VITEK MS for the identification of various clinically relevant yeast species, focusing on the use of the FA extraction method. Methods: We analyzed 309 clinical isolates of 42 yeast species (four common Candida species, Cryptococcus neoformans, and 37 uncommon yeast species) using the Biotyper and VITEK MS systems. FA extraction was used initially for all isolates. If ‘no identification’ result was obtained following the initial FA extraction, these samples were then retested by using FA (both systems, additive FA) or FA/ACN (Biotyper only, additive FA/ACN) extraction. These results were compared with those obtained by sequence-based identification. Results: Both systems correctly identified all 158 isolates of the four common Candida species after the initial FA extraction. The Biotyper correctly identified 8.7%, 30.4%, and 100% of 23 C. neoformans isolates after performing initial FA, additive FA, and FA/ACN extractions, respectively, while VITEK MS identified all C. neoformans isolates after the initial FA extraction. Both systems had comparable identification rates of 37 uncommon yeast species (128 isolates), following the initial FA (Biotyper, 74.2%; VITEK MS, 73.4%) or additive FA (Biotyper, 82.0%; VITEK MS, 73.4%). Conclusions: The identification rate of most common and uncommon yeast isolates is comparable between simple FA extraction/Biotyper method and VITEK MS methods, but FA/ ACN extraction is necessary for C. neoformans identification by Biotyper.
机译:背景:基质辅助激光解吸/电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF MS)可以快速准确地鉴定临床酵母菌。建议在使用MALDI Biotyper进行分析之前先进行管内甲酸/乙腈(FA / ACN)萃取,但是直接板载FA萃取更为简单。我们将Biotyper与VITEK MS进行了比较,以鉴定各种临床相关的酵母菌种,重点是FA提取方法的使用。方法:我们使用Biotyper和VITEK MS系统分析了309种临床分离株,包括42种酵母菌(四种常见的念珠菌,新隐球菌和37种罕见的酵母菌)。 FA提取最初用于所有分离株。如果在初次FA提取后未获得“鉴定”结果,则可以使用FA(两种系统,添加剂FA)或FA / ACN(仅Biotyper,添加剂FA / ACN)提取对这些样品进行重新测试。将这些结果与通过基于序列的鉴定获得的结果进行比较。结果:初次FA提取后,两个系统均正确鉴定了四种常见念珠菌属的所有158个分离株。 Biotyper分别在执行初始FA,附加FA和FA / ACN提取后分别正确鉴定了23%的新形成梭状芽胞杆菌分离株的8.7%,30.4%和100%,而VITEK MS在最初的FA提取后鉴定出了所有新近隐化梭状芽胞杆菌分离株。在最初的FA(Biotyper,74.2%; VITEK MS,73.4%)或添加的FA(Biotyper,82.0%; VITEK MS,73.4%)之后,两种系统对37种罕见酵母物种(128个分离株)的鉴定率均相当。结论:在简单的FA提取/ Biotyper方法和VITEK MS方法之间,最常见和不常见的酵母分离株的鉴定率是可比的,但是对于用Biotyper鉴定新孢梭菌,FA / ACN提取是必需的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号