首页> 外文期刊>Annals of King Edward Medical University. >A comparison of airway maintenance by cuffed Oropharyngeal airway (COPA) and laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in spontaneously breathing adult patients
【24h】

A comparison of airway maintenance by cuffed Oropharyngeal airway (COPA) and laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in spontaneously breathing adult patients

机译:成年自发性呼吸患者的带套口咽气道(COPA)和喉罩气道(LMA)维持气道的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

In this study total hundred patients wee included. Fifty (group I) were subjected to COPA device for airway maintenance and in other fifty (group II) LMA was used. In this study first attempt successful insertion rate in group I was 90% while in group II it was 94%. However statistical analysis showed no significant different in both groups. Regarding maneuvers needed to maintain smooth breathing in group I head tilt was used in 2 %. It is significantly high in group I than in group II. Laboured breathing was seen in 6% in group I while 2% in group II. There was no significant difference in both groups. According to this study LMA is better in all respect as it is easier to insert and better fit in.
机译:在这项研究中,总共包括一百名患者。五十(第一组)接受了COPA装置进行气道维护,另外五十(第二组)使用了LMA。在这项研究中,第一组的首次成功插入率为90%,而第二组为94%。然而,统计分析显示两组均无显着差异。关于在第一组中保持平稳呼吸所需的动作,使用2%的头倾斜。第一组比第二组明显更高。在第一组中有6%的人呼吸困难,而在第二组中有2%的人呼吸困难。两组均无明显差异。根据这项研究,LMA在各个方面都更好,因为它更易于插入和更好地安装。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号