首页> 外文期刊>Canadian journal of anesthesia: Journal canadien d'anesthesie >Water flow between the upper esophagus and pharynx for the LMA and COPA in fresh cadavers. Laryngeal mask airway, and cuffed oropharyngeal airway.
【24h】

Water flow between the upper esophagus and pharynx for the LMA and COPA in fresh cadavers. Laryngeal mask airway, and cuffed oropharyngeal airway.

机译:新鲜尸体中LMA和COPA的食道上部和咽部之间的水流。喉罩气道和袖带口咽气道。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

PURPOSE: In this randomised, crossover cadaver study, we determine the esophageal pressure (EP) at which water flow occurs between the upper esophagus and pharynx for the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and cuffed oropharyngeal airway (COPA). METHODS: Ten male and ten female cadavers were studied. The infusion set of a pressure controlled, continuous flow pump was inserted into the upper esophagus and ligated into place. The EP was increased in 2 cm H2O increments. This was performed without an airway device (controls) and over a range of cuff volumes for the LMA (0-40 ml) and COPA (0-60 ml). Regurgitation pressure (RP) was the EP at which fluid was first seen with a fibreoptic scope in the hypopharynx (controls) and above or below the cuff (LMA and COPA). RESULTS: The RP was higher for the LMA than for the COPA and controls (P<0.0004), and RP was similar for COPA and controls. There was an increase in RP with increasing cuff volume for the LMA from 0 to 10 ml (P<0.0001). There were no increases in RP with increasing cuff volume for the COPA. The EP at which fluid leaked above and below the cuff was similar for the LMA at all cuff volumes. The EP at which fluid leaked above the cuff was higher than below the cuff for the COPA when the cuff volume was 40 ml (P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: In fresh cadavers, the LMA provides better airway protection from fluid in the upper esophagus than the COPA.
机译:目的:在这项随机,交叉的尸体研究中,我们确定食道压力(EP),在该压力下,喉罩气道(LMA)和带套口咽气道(COPA)的食道上部和咽部之间会发生水流。方法:研究了十具男性尸体和十具女性尸体。将压力控制的连续流泵的输液器插入上食道并结扎到位。 EP以2 cm H2O的增量增加。这在没有气道装置(对照)的情况下进行,并且在LMA(0-40 ml)和COPA(0-60 ml)的袖带容积范围内进行。返流压力(RP)是在下咽处(对照)以及袖带上方或下方(LMA和COPA)处首次出现纤维化范围的液体。结果:LMA的RP高于COPA和对照组(P <0.0004),而COPA和对照组的RP相似。随着LMA袖带体积的增加,RP从0毫升增加到10毫升(P <0.0001)。随着COPA袖带容积的增加,RP没有增加。在所有袖带体积下,LMA处的液体泄漏到袖带上方和下方的EP均相似。当袖带容积为40 ml(P <0.0001)时,对于COPA,在袖带上方泄漏的液体的EP高于在袖带下方的EP。结论:在新鲜的尸体中,与COPA相比,LMA可以更好地保护气道免受上食道积液的侵害。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号