首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Intensive Care >Passive leg raise testing effectively reduces fluid administration in septic shock after correction of non-compliance to test results
【24h】

Passive leg raise testing effectively reduces fluid administration in septic shock after correction of non-compliance to test results

机译:纠正不符合测试结果后,被动抬腿测试可有效减少败血性休克中的补液

获取原文
       

摘要

BackgroundFluid resuscitation is considered a cornerstone of shock treatment, but recent data have underlined the potential hazards of fluid overload. The passive leg raise (PLR) test has been introduced as one of many strategies to predict ‘fluid responsiveness.’ The use of PLR testing is applicable to a wide range of clinical situations and has the potential to reduce fluid administration, since PLR testing is based upon (reversible) autotransfusion. Despite these theoretical advantages, data on the net effect on fluid balance as a result of PLR testing remain scarce. MethodsWe performed a prospective single-center multi-step interventional study in patients with septic shock to evaluate the effect of implementation of PLR testing on the fluid balance (FB) 48 hours after ICU admission. All patients were equipped with a PiCCO? device for pulse contour analysis to guide fluid administration. An increase in stroke volume (SV) ≥ 10% was considered a positive test result. ResultsBefore introduction of PLR testing, 21 patients were prospectively included in period 1 with a median FB of 4.8 [3.3–7.8]L. After an extensive training program, PLR testing was introduced and 20 patients were included in period 2. Median FB was 4.4 [3.3–7.5]L and did not differ from period 1 ( p = 0.72). Further analysis revealed that non-compliance to the PLR test result was 44%. These findings were discussed with all ICU doctors and nurses. By consensus, non-compliance to the PLR test result was identified as the main reason for unsuccessful implementation of PLR testing. After this evaluation, 19 patients were included in period 3 under equal conditions as in period 2. In this period, median FB was 3.1 [1.5–4.9]L and significantly reduced in comparison with periods 1 and 2 ( p = 0.016 and p = 0.023, respectively). Non-compliance was 9% and significantly lower than in period 2 ( p = 0.009). ConclusionImplementation of PLR testing in patients with septic shock reduced fluid administration in the first 48 hours of ICU admission significantly and substantially. To achieve this endpoint, substantial non-compliance of ICU team members had to be addressed. Fluid administration despite a negative PLR test was the most common form of non-compliance.
机译:背景流体复苏被认为是休克治疗的基石,但最近的数据强调了液体超负荷的潜在危险。被动腿抬高(PLR)测试已作为预测“流体反应性”的许多策略之一被引入。PLR测试的使用适用于广泛的临床情况,并且有可能减少输液,因为PLR测试是基于(可逆)自体输血。尽管有这些理论上的优势,但有关PLR测试对流体平衡的净影响的数据仍然很少。方法我们对败血性休克患者进行了一项前瞻性单中心多步骤干预研究,以评估ICU入院48小时后实施PLR测试对体液平衡(FB)的影响。所有患者均配备了PiCCO ?装置,用于脉搏轮廓分析以指导输液。每搏输出量(SV)的增加≥10%被认为是阳性测试结果。结果在进行PLR测试之前,前1例患者被纳入前瞻性研究,其中FB中位数为4.8 [3.3–7.8] L。经过广泛的培训计划后,在第二阶段引入了PLR测试,并纳入了20例患者。中位FB为4.4 [3.3-7.5] L,与第一阶段没有差异(p = 0.72)。进一步分析显示,不符合PLR测试结果的比例为44%。与所有ICU医生和护士讨论了这些发现。通过协商一致,不符合PLR测试结果被确定为未能成功执行PLR测试的主要原因。经过此评估后,在第3阶段与第2阶段处于相同条件下纳入了19例患者。在此期间,中位FB为3.1 [1.5-4.9] L,与第1阶段和第2阶段相比明显降低(p = 0.016和p =分别为0.023)。违规率为9%,明显低于第2阶段(p = 0.009)。结论败血症性休克患者实施PLR检测可显着,大幅度减少ICU入院后48小时内的输液量。为了实现此目标,必须解决ICU团队成员严重不合规的问题。尽管PLR测试阴性,但输液仍是最常见的违规行为。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号