首页> 外文期刊>Atmospheric chemistry and physics >Seasonal variability of stratospheric methane: implications for constraining tropospheric methane budgets using total column observations
【24h】

Seasonal variability of stratospheric methane: implications for constraining tropospheric methane budgets using total column observations

机译:平流层甲烷的季节变化:使用总柱观测资料对对流层甲烷预算的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

Global and regional methane budgets are markedly uncertain. Conventionally, estimates of methane sources are derived by bridging emissions inventories with atmospheric observations employing chemical transport models. The accuracy of this approach requires correctly simulating advection and chemical loss such that modeled methane concentrations scale with surface fluxes. When total column measurements are assimilated into this framework, modeled stratospheric methane introduces additional potential for error. To evaluate the impact of such errors, we compare Total Carbon Column Observing Network (TCCON) and GEOS-Chem total and tropospheric column-averaged dry-air mole fractions of methane. We find that the model's stratospheric contribution to the total column is insensitive to perturbations to the seasonality or distribution of itropospheric/i emissions or loss. In the Northern Hemisphere, we identify disagreement between the measured and modeled stratospheric contribution, which increases as the tropopause altitude decreases, and a temporal phase lag in the model's tropospheric seasonality driven by transport errors. Within the context of GEOS-Chem, we find that the errors in tropospheric advection partially compensate for the stratospheric methane errors, masking inconsistencies between the modeled and measured tropospheric methane. These seasonally varying errors alias into source attributions resulting from model inversions. In particular, we suggest that the tropospheric phase lag error leads to large misdiagnoses of wetland emissions in the high latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere.
机译:全球和区域甲烷预算明显不确定。按照惯例,甲烷排放量的估算是通过将排放清单与采用化学传输模型的大气观测值相结合得出的。这种方法的准确性要求正确模拟对流和化学损失,以使模拟的甲烷浓度随表面通量成比例。当将整个色谱柱测量值吸收到该框架中时,模拟的平流层甲烷会带来额外的潜在误差。为了评估此类错误的影响,我们比较了总碳柱观测网络(TCCON)和GEOS-Chem的总和对流层甲烷的平均干燥空气摩尔分数。我们发现,该模型对平流层对总柱的贡献对对流层排放或损失的季节性或分布的扰动不敏感。在北半球,我们发现平流层贡献与实测值之间存在分歧,随着对流层顶高度的减小,平流层贡献增加,而运输误差驱动的模型对流层季节性随时间相位滞后。在GEOS-Chem的背景下,我们发现对流层对流中的误差部分补偿了平流层甲烷的误差,从而掩盖了对流层甲烷与测量值之间的不一致性。这些季节性变化的误差会归因于模型反演导致的源归因。特别是,我们认为对流层相位滞后误差会导致对北半球高纬度地区湿地排放的大量误诊。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号