...
首页> 外文期刊>Asian Journal of Transfusion Science >Flow cytometric enumeration of CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells: A comparison between single- versus dual-platform methodology using the International Society of Hematotherapy and Graft Engineering protocol
【24h】

Flow cytometric enumeration of CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells: A comparison between single- versus dual-platform methodology using the International Society of Hematotherapy and Graft Engineering protocol

机译:CD34 +造血干细胞的流式细胞计数:使用国际血液疗法和移植工程学会协议的单平台和双平台方法之间的比较

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Flow cytometric enumeration of CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) is the reference point for undertaking apheresis and evaluation of adequacy for peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) engraftment. AIMS: To determine whether single platform correlates with dual platform methods in CD34+ enumeration using ISHAGE protocol. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of CD34 Enumeration assays on both peripheral blood and PBSC product samples using Beckman Coulter FC500 Flow Cytometer. The t test and correlation study was used to study the difference between single and dual platform methods in CD34+ enumeration. RESULTS: We present our data on 152 samples comprising 41 peripheral blood samples collected before apheresis procedure and 111 samples collected from PBSC product. We observed strong positive correlation between single and dual platform methods for CD34+ counts in peripheral blood sample ( r = 0.92; P 0.001) and PBSC product sample ( r = 0.85; P 0.001). CONCLUSION: In our study, both single versus dual platform had similar results in CD34+ cell counts. The single platform provides rapid results with ease of procedure. Errors with dual platforms are relatively common with respect to denominator. We recommend to use mean of total leukocyte count from two different hematology analyzer to minimize variation in dual platform.
机译:背景:CD34 +造血干细胞(HSC)的流式细胞计数是进行单采和评估外周血干细胞(PBSC)植入是否足够的参考点。目的:确定使用ISHAGE协议在CD34 +枚举中单个平台是否与双平台方法相关。方法:使用Beckman Coulter FC500流式细胞仪对外周血和PBSC产品样品进行CD34枚举分析的回顾性分析。 t检验和相关性研究用于研究CD34 +枚举中单平台方法和双平台方法之间的差异。结果:我们提供了152个样本的数据,其中包括41个在采血之前的外周血样本和111个从PBSC产品中收集的样本。我们观察到外周血样品(r = 0.92; P <0.001)和PBSC产品样品(r = 0.85; P <0.001)的单平台方法和双平台方法之间的CD3​​4 +计数之间存在强正相关。结论:在我们的研究中,单平台和双平台在CD34 +细胞计数上都有相似的结果。单一平台可提供快速结果,并且易于操作。关于分母,双平台的错误相对常见。我们建议使用来自两个不同血液分析仪的白细胞总数的平均值,以最大程度地减少双平台的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号