首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Environmental Protection >Institutional Obstacles on the Development of Forest Management Unit: The Case of Indonesian Tasik Besar Serkap
【24h】

Institutional Obstacles on the Development of Forest Management Unit: The Case of Indonesian Tasik Besar Serkap

机译:森林经营单位发展的制度障碍:以印度尼西亚的Tasik Besar Serkap为例

获取原文
           

摘要

Three years since its establishment in 2010, the forest management unit (Kesatuan Pengelolaan Hutan, KPH)-Tasik Besar Serkap (KPH-TBS) in Riau Province–Indonesia has not been operated yet due to institutional problem. Therefore, the review on the institutional handicap is necessary. This study uses the Ostrom’s Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) Framework to analyze the policy implementation of KPH-TBS development. Analysis was conducted to describe the conditions of exogenous factors and the action arena that obstructing the policy implementation by Riau provincial government (RPG). Conceptually, the policy of KPHs development is institutional changing processes, which are changes in the value system and forest governance. The research found problems that became disincentives on biophysical conditions, such as problems on paradigm, forestry bureaucracy culture and several weaknesses in the rules in use. In addition, structural approach and physical assistance were mostly used by national government for its provincial government. In contrast, knowledge dissemination, communication and mutual trust building were still limitedly used. Former approaches do not address the needs of RPG for information and understanding regarding to the development of KPH. RPG responded to this situation slowly and lack of willingness to cooperate. They took the policy of KPHs development as a mere obligation, and did not get motivated to move by themselves. In addition, the reluctance to cooperate was also caused by the presence of conflict of interest in several government officials. Based on this research, national government need to changes the way of thinking that regulation is not the only instrument to guide the behavior of local participants. Although still needs to be repaired, it must be accompanied by improving of knowledge dissemination, communication and mutual trust building. These actions are highly required not only for resistance solution, but also for controling the paradigms transformation process and cultur of local participants in line with composed new values in the KPH concept.
机译:自2010年成立以来的三年,由于体制方面的问题,印度尼西亚廖内省的森林管理部门(Kesatuan Pengelolaan Hutan,KPH)-Tasik Besar Serkap(KPH-TBS)尚未运营。因此,有必要对制度障碍进行审查。这项研究使用Ostrom的机构分析和发展(IAD)框架来分析KPH-TBS开发的政策实施情况。进行分析以描述阻碍廖内省政府执行政策的外在因素的条件和行动领域。从概念上讲,KPH的发展政策是机构变更过程,即价值体系和森林治理的变更。该研究发现了对生物物理条件不利的问题,例如范式,林业官僚文化和使用规则中的一些弱点。此外,国家政府主要使用结构性方法和物质援助作为其省政府。相反,知识传播,沟通和相互信任的建立仍然受到限制。以前的方法不能满足RPG对KPH的发展所需的信息和了解的需求。 RPG对这种情况的反应缓慢,缺乏合作意愿。他们仅将KPH的发展政策视为义务,并没有动力自行行动。此外,几名政府官员之间存在利益冲突,也导致了不愿合作。基于这项研究,中央政府需要改变这样一种思维方式,即监管不是指导当地参与者行为的唯一工具。尽管仍然需要修复,但必须伴随着知识传播,沟通和互信建立的改善。这些行动不仅对于抵抗力解决方案,而且对于控制范式转换过程以及根据KPH概念中新组合的价值观来控制本地参与者的文化都是非常需要的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号