首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Medicine and Surgery >Completeness in clerking: The surgical admissions proforma
【24h】

Completeness in clerking: The surgical admissions proforma

机译:办事员的完整性:手术入院的形式

获取原文
       

摘要

Background The accessibility of surgical patient data is a key safety concern, and relies on efficient clerking and handovers. This project assessed whether the introduction of a surgical clerking proforma improved the recording of patient information in the surgical admissions unit (SAU) at Northwick Park Hospital. Materials and methods Existing patient notes were assessed on content and ease of access, using two independent surveys conducted over a 5-day period. The first survey audited patient notes before (n?=?28) and after (n?=?23) the introduction of the proforma. It assessed whether key patient details were documented, in line with the 17 criteria set out in the Guidelines for Clinicians on Medical Records and Notes by The Royal College of Surgeons in England. The second survey questioned healthcare professionals before (n?=?25) and after (n?=?17) proforma implementation on the accessibility of patient data and coherency of patient notes. Results 5 of the 17 criteria showed significant differences post proforma implementation. Of these differences, the recording of height and occupation was most notable (p??0.01). Medication history, weight and investigations also showed significant increases in documentation (p??0.05). In all 3 questions asked to healthcare professionals, fewer healthcare professionals were required to revisit archived notes following proforma implementation (p??0.05). Conclusion Our study illustrates that a comprehensive surgical clerking proforma improves patient data documentation and saves healthcare professionals' time compared to the freehand clerking method. The implications of such work are far reaching, and if well implemented could allow a new reliable platform for further clinical audits. Highlights ? A study comparing the implementation of a surgical clerking proforma vs. freehand clerking. ? The coherency of patient notes before and after proforma implementation was assessed. ? 5 of the 17 criteria showed significant improvement post proforma implementation. ? Fewer healthcare staff were required to revisit patient notes following proforma implementation. ? The study illustrates that the implementation of a surgical admissions proforma improves patient documentation.
机译:背景技术外科手术患者数据的可访问性是关键的安全问题,并且依赖于有效的整理和移交。该项目评估了引入外科文书形式是否改善了诺斯威克公园医院外科收治科(SAU)中患者信息的记录。材料和方法使用为期5天的两次独立调查,评估了现有患者备忘的内容和易用性。第一次调查对引入备考之前(n?=?28)和之后(n?=?23)的患者笔记进行了审核。它评估了是否根据英国皇家外科医学院的《病历和笔记临床医生指南》中列出的17条标准记录了患者的关键细节。第二次调查在形式化实施之前(n = 25)和之后(n = 17)质疑医疗保健专业人员,有关患者数据的可访问性和患者备注的一致性。 17个标准中的结果5显示,形式实施后存在显着差异。在这些差异中,身高和职业的记录最为显着(p <0.01)。用药史,体重和调查结果也显示文献记录显着增加(p <0.05)。在向医疗保健专业人员提出的所有3个问题中,减少了实施形式要求后重新访问存档笔记的医疗保健专业人员的数量(p <0.05)。结论我们的研究表明,与徒手书写方法相比,全面的外科文书处理形式可改善患者数据记录并节省医疗保健专业人员的时间。此类工作的意义是深远的,如果实施得当可以为进一步的临床审核提供新的可靠平台。强调 ?一项研究比较了外科文书形式与徒手文书形式的实施情况。 ?评估形式实施前后患者笔记的连贯性。 ? 17个标准中的5个显示出形式实施后有显着改善。 ?在执行形式之后,需要更少的医护人员重新审查患者注意事项。 ?该研究表明,手术入院形式的实施可以改善患者的文献记录。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号