首页> 外文期刊>Animal Studies Journal >Ecofeminism and animal advocacy in Australia: Productive Encounters for an Integrative Ethics and Politics
【24h】

Ecofeminism and animal advocacy in Australia: Productive Encounters for an Integrative Ethics and Politics

机译:澳大利亚的生态女权主义和动物倡导:道德与政治融合的生产性遭遇

获取原文
       

摘要

The paper considers how ecological feminist philosophies can enrich the animal advocacy movement and its liberatory politics and ethics. Building on existing literature, I argue that ecofeminist theories can help deepen our thinking about our relationship with animals and the more-than-human world; about our intersectional struggle to end oppression; and about putting this into practice, especially in relation to food. I focus on the work of Australian philosopher and feminist Val Plumwood to work through these issues. I examine Plumwood’s critique of dualism and anthropocentrism and how it reflects a particular Australian vision of nature. Her take on animal Others also challenges the way humans hyperseparate themselves from nonhuman animals, background, homogenise and instrumentalise them through the ‘the abstractly quantitative and commodified concept of meat’ (Plumwood, Environmental Culture 156). In this perspective, veganism emerges as an essential step on a long journey towards building ethical relationships with nonhuman others. However, as animal advocates, we cannot presume that veganism is sufficient in and of itself because the exploitation and commodification of nonhuman animals is just one expression (albeit large-scale and with very significant consequences) of dualistic and oppressive ideologies used to justify the brutal domination of nature. Following Plumwood, I argue that we need to challenge deeply our systems of knowledge and the logical features of dualisms to face animal exploitation and the current ecocide, and to inform our approach to social change and activism. This somewhat differs from popular analyses within critical animal studies that focus on the political economy of the animal-industrial complex and target capitalism in their fight for animal liberation. Yet, the choice between addressing ideologies and structures of oppression (including economic ones) seems to be a false one, so I propose to rethink veganism along both these lines to ground it in a more ecological way, embracing the more-than-human world at large, but also in a more political way.
机译:本文考虑了生态女性主义哲学如何丰富动物倡导运动及其解放的政治和道德。在现有文献的基础上,我认为生态女性主义理论可以帮助加深我们对与动物和人类世界的关系的思考。关于我们为结束压迫而进行的交叉斗争;并将其付诸实践,尤其是在食品方面。我专注于澳大利亚哲学家和女权主义者瓦尔·普拉姆伍德(Val Plumwood)的工作,以解决这些问题。我研究了Plumwood对二元论和人类中心主义的批评,以及它如何反映澳大利亚人对自然的特殊看法。她对动物“其他”的看法也挑战了人类如何通过“抽象定量和商品化的肉类概念”将人类与非人类动物,背景,同质化和工具化分离的方式(Plumwood,环境文化156)。从这个角度来看,素食主义是与非人类他人建立道德关系的漫长旅程中必不可少的一步。但是,作为动物的拥护者,我们不能认为素食主义本身就足够了,因为对非人类动物的开发和商品化只是用来证明残酷的对偶和压迫意识形态的一种表达(尽管是大规模的,并且具有非常重大的后果)。大自然的统治。继Plumwood之后,我认为我们需要深刻挑战我们的知识体系和二元论的逻辑特征,以面对动物剥削和当前的生态灭绝,并为我们应对社会变革和行动主义的方法提供信息。这与批判性动物研究中的流行分析有所不同,后者在侧重于动物工业复合体的政治经济学,并在争取动物解放的斗争中瞄准了资本主义。但是,在解决意识形态和压迫结构(包括经济压迫)的结构之间的选择似乎是错误的,因此,我建议重新考虑这两种思路的素食主义,以更加生态的方式扎根素食主义,拥抱比人类更普遍的世界总的来说,也以一种更具政治性的方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号