首页> 外文期刊>Ethics & the environment >CONSIDERING ANIMALS: KHEEL'S NATURE ETHICS AND ANIMAL DEBATES IN ECOFEMINISM
【24h】

CONSIDERING ANIMALS: KHEEL'S NATURE ETHICS AND ANIMAL DEBATES IN ECOFEMINISM

机译:考虑动物:生态女性主义的凯尔的自然伦理和动物辩论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

How we treat the use of animals by humans for sport, experimentation or food has been controversial within ecofeminism. While it is fair to say that all ecofeminists agree that factory farming and cruel treatment of animals is morally wrong, universal arguments for vegetarianism or veganism have been, if one forgives the metaphor, a bone of contention. Attached to these disagreements are important philosophical and political debates about ecological holism, individualistic frameworks, cultural difference, social privilege and ethics of care, which are consequential above and beyond evaluating our treatment of animals. Thus, ecofeminist discussions of animal issues have been formative for environmental ethics and politics, while remaining a delicate matter when disagreement occurs among a relatively small group of thinkers, activists and scholars who tend towards solidarity.
机译:生态女权主义在我们如何对待人类将动物用于运动,实验或食物等问题上引起争议。可以公平地说,所有生态女性主义者都同意工厂化养殖和对动物的残酷对待在道义上是错误的,但是,如果人们宽容了这个比喻,那么素食主义者或素食主义者的普遍论点已经成为争论的焦点。与这些分歧相关的是关于生态整体论,个人主义框架,文化差异,社会特权和照料伦理的重要哲学和政治辩论,其重要性超出了评估我们对动物的待遇。因此,生态女性主义对动物问题的讨论已经形成了环境伦理学和政治学的形成,而当相对少数一群倾向于团结的思想家,活动家和学者之间出现分歧时,这仍然是一个微妙的问题。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Ethics & the environment》 |2009年第2期|153-162164|共11页
  • 作者

    NOEEL STURGEON;

  • 作者单位

    Washington State University;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 02:20:17

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号