首页> 外文期刊>Anesthesia and pain medicine. >Comparison of prophylactic anti-emetic effects of ramosetron between single bolus administration and continuous infusion following bolus administration
【24h】

Comparison of prophylactic anti-emetic effects of ramosetron between single bolus administration and continuous infusion following bolus administration

机译:单次推注和推注后连续输注之间雷莫司琼的预防性止吐作用比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: The authors hypothesized that the continuous infusion of ramosetron 0.15 mg following a 0.15 mg bolus administration would maintain higher 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 receptor occupancy levels and be more effective in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) than a 0.3 mg single bolus administration. We conducted a study to compare the efficacy of single bolus ramosetron administration with the combination of continuous infusion following intravenous bolus administration for PONV prophylaxis.
机译:背景:作者假设在0.15毫克推注后连续输注雷莫司琼0.15毫克,将维持较高的5-羟色胺3型受体占有水平,并且比0.3毫克单次推注更能有效地预防术后恶心和呕吐(PONV)。 。我们进行了一项研究,以比较单次推注雷莫司琼与静脉推注给药后连续输注的预防PONV的疗效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号