...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Cardiology >Comparison between fixed-dose, intracoronary bolus-only versus standard weight-adjusted dose, intravenous bolus and infusion administration of abciximab in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.
【24h】

Comparison between fixed-dose, intracoronary bolus-only versus standard weight-adjusted dose, intravenous bolus and infusion administration of abciximab in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

机译:在接受初次经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者中,固定剂量,仅冠状动脉内推注与标准体重调整剂量,静脉推注和阿昔单抗输注之间的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We studied the safety and effectiveness of fixed-dose, intracoronary bolus-only abciximab in 195 patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. The patients were divided into 2 groups: Group A (n=120, 61.5%) received fixed-dose, intracoronary bolus-only, abciximab 10 mg; and Group B (n=75, 38.5%) received standard intravenous bolus (0.25 mg/kg) and maintenance abciximab infusion of 0.125 mug/kg/min for 12 h. There was no statistically significant difference in the baseline and post-procedure TIMI flow between Groups A and B. Final TIMI 3 flow was achieved in 90.0% and 89.3% of the patients in Groups A and B, respectively (p=0.14). Final TIMI myocardial perfusion grade 2/3 was achieved in 92.5% and 96.0% of the patients in Groups A and B, respectively (p=0.45). The six-month clinical outcomes were similar between Groups A and B (8.3% versus 5.3%, p=0.62).
机译:我们研究了195例接受固定剂量冠状动脉内推注阿昔单抗在原发性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的安全性和有效性。患者分为两组:A组(n = 120,61.5%)接受固定剂量的冠状动脉内单剂量阿昔单抗10 mg治疗; B组(n = 75,38.5%)接受标准静脉推注(0.25 mg / kg),维持阿昔单抗0.125杯/ kg / min的持续输注,持续12 h。 A组和B组之间的基线和手术后TIMI流量无统计学差异。A组和B组分别有90.0%和89.3%的患者达到了最终TIMI 3流量(p = 0.14)。 A组和B组分别有92.5%和96.0%的患者达到了最终TIMI心肌灌注等级2/3(p = 0.45)。 A组和B组的六个月临床结果相似(8.3%对5.3%,p = 0.62)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号