首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics >Comparison of Tests of Indirect Effect in Single Mediation Analysis
【24h】

Comparison of Tests of Indirect Effect in Single Mediation Analysis

机译:单一调解分析中间接效应测试的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

This study compares various methods of mediations analysis. Firstly, it compares the two methods of calculating indirect effect which are product of coefficient and difference of coefficients respectively. Secondly, the study compares the three methods of testing the significance of indirect effect vis avis Sobel's test, Aroian test and Goodman's test. The differences in these three tests are due to variations in the methods of standard error computation. The findings are discussed. The results show that both methods of product of coefficients and difference of coefficients give approximately the same result. However the product of coefficient gave a slightly higher result. The comparison of test of indirect effect for mediator shows that the tests gave the same result for Sobel's, Aroian and Goodman test. The study recommended further studies to seek methods of ascertaining the direction of relationship of indirect effect, other than those of the regression models, further studies may be carried out to determine the effect of multicolinearity on mediation results.
机译:本研究比较了各种中介分析方法。首先,比较了间接效果的两种计算方法:系数乘积和系数差。其次,本研究比较了三种间接检验方法相对于Sobel检验,Aroian检验和Goodman检验的显着性。这三个测试的差异是由于标准误差计算方法的不同而引起的。研究结果进行了讨论。结果表明,系数乘积和系数差的两种方法得出的结果大致相同。但是,系数的乘积给出了略高的结果。间接影响测试对中介者的比较表明,这些测试与Sobel,Aroian和Goodman测试的结果相同。该研究建议进行进一步的研究以寻求确定间接效应之间关系的方向的方法,而不是回归模型的方法,还可以进行进一步的研究以确定多重线性对调解结果的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号