...
首页> 外文期刊>American journal of public health >From Patchwork to Package: Implementing Foundational Capabilities for State and Local Health Departments
【24h】

From Patchwork to Package: Implementing Foundational Capabilities for State and Local Health Departments

机译:从拼凑到打包:为州和地方卫生部门实施基础功能

获取原文

摘要

Daily public health responses are threatened by the inadequate capacity of public health agencies. A 2012 Institute of Medicine report defined a package of foundational capabilities that support all programs and services within a health department. Standardizing foundational capabilities may help address the increasing disparity in health department performance nationally. During the Fall of 2013, we collected information on how much state and local health departments knew about foundational capabilities. To our knowledge, this was the first study to assess current health department infrastructure as it relates to foundational capabilities. The recent economic recession further destabilized the already fragile public health infrastructure in the United States. 1 Nationally, local and state health departments have lost 10%–12% of their staff since 2008 as a direct result of budget reductions and cost-saving strategies. 2,3 Although departments across the United States did not all experience losses equally, these workforce reductions exacerbated an existing disparity in public health funding, services, and staffing. 4 The continued erosion of public health agencies’ capacity across the United States threatens their ability to deliver timely clinical and population-based services, as well as address day-to-day public health needs. Although public health services have been credited with providing 25 of the 30 years of increased life expectancy in the 20th century, 5 the eroding public health infrastructure challenges our ability to maintain these gains and threatens our capacity to confront the mounting epidemics of chronic disease and emerging infectious disease. 6 In 2009, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) formed a committee to consider the structure, functions, and financing of the governmental public health system. The committee’s findings, published in the 2012 For the Public’s Health: Investing in a Healthier Future , 7 recommended a “minimum package of public health programs and services” to complement and reinforce the minimum package of clinical health care services created by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA). A key part of the public health minimum package was a set of foundational capabilities; these are the cross-cutting skills essential to the governmental public health infrastructure needed everywhere for the governmental public health system to work anywhere, such as disease surveillance, communications, policy development, and financial management. In short, a public health response is only as robust as the individual health departments engaged in addressing a threat; therefore, all must have the requisite capacity and capabilities for the larger public health system to function effectively. Efforts to develop and maintain these capabilities in public health departments are often unfunded despite many ongoing initiatives dedicated to supporting them. Following the IOM report, national funders and public health organizations developed the concept of a minimum package of capabilities for public health agencies into the Foundational Public Health Services (FPHS) model ( Figure 1 ). This model also incorporated the idea of “Foundational Areas,” which are core public health programs and activities. 8 The states of Washington and Ohio led groundbreaking work to define and to determine the cost of the specific skills and services that would comprise a “package” of the FPHS. 9,10 Despite the development of the foundational capability concept and FPHS model, little concrete information is available about the degree to which health departments are familiar with or are establishing or funding related services. In our study, we collected information about “how much” and “what” leaders of state and local health departments know about the concept of foundational capabilities in public health practice. These findings will be useful to policymakers and practitioners as they move from defining the concepts to securing sustainable funding for FPHS programs and services. Open in a separate window FIGURE 1— Foundational Public Health Services model. Note. HD = health department; HR?=?human resources; IT?=?information technology; QI?=?quality improvement.
机译:日常公共卫生应对措施受到公共卫生机构能力不足的威胁。 2012年,医学研究院的一份报告定义了一系列基础功能,以支持卫生部门内的所有计划和服务。基础能力的标准化可能有助于解决全国卫生部门绩效日益扩大的问题。在2013年秋季,我们收集了有关州和地方卫生部门对基础能力了解多少的信息。据我们所知,这是评估与基础能力有关的当前卫生部门基础设施的第一项研究。最近的经济衰退进一步破坏了美国本已脆弱的公共卫生基础设施。 1在全国范围内,由于预算削减和成本节省策略的直接结果,自2008年以来,地方和州的卫生部门失去了10%至12%的员工。 2,3尽管美国各部门的损失并非均等,但这些裁员现象加剧了公共卫生资金,服务和人员配备方面的现有差距。 4美国各地公共卫生机构能力的持续削弱,威胁到其提供及时的临床和基于人群的服务以及满足日常公共卫生需求的能力。尽管在20世纪30年的预期寿命中,有25年获得了公共卫生服务的认可,但5不断侵蚀的公共卫生基础设施挑战了我们维持这些收益的能力,并威胁了我们应对日益严重的慢性病和新兴疾病的能力。传染病。 6 2009年,医学研究所(IOM)成立了一个委员会,负责研究政府公共卫生系统的结构,功能和经费。该委员会的调查结果发表在2012年的《为公众的健康:投资于更健康的未来》 7中,建议采用“公共卫生计划和服务的最低限度方案”,以补充和加强由患者保护和预防中心创建的临床卫生服务的最低限度方案。负担得起的护理法(ACA)。基本公共卫生一揽子计划的关键部分是一系列基础能力。这些是政府公共卫生基础设施必不可少的跨领域技能,使政府公共卫生体系能够在任何地方工作,例如疾病监视,沟通,政策制定和财务管理。简而言之,公共卫生应对措施仅与参与应对威胁的各个卫生部门一样强大。因此,所有人都必须具备使大型公共卫生系统有效运行所必需的能力。尽管有许多旨在支持公共卫生部门的举措,但公共卫生部门用于发展和维护这些能力的努力通常没有资金。在IOM报告之后,国家出资者和公共卫生组织将公共卫生机构的最低限度服务包的概念发展为基础公共卫生服务(FPHS)模型(图1)。该模型还纳入了“基础区域”的概念,这是核心的公共卫生计划和活动。 8华盛顿州和俄亥俄州领导了开创性工作,以定义和确定构成FPHS“一揽子计划”的特定技能和服务的成本。 9,10尽管基础能力概念和FPHS模型得到了发展,但几乎没有关于卫生部门熟悉程度或正在建立或资助相关服务的具体信息。在我们的研究中,我们收集了有关州和地方卫生部门的领导人“多少”和“什么”对公共卫生实践中基本能力的概念了解的信息。这些发现对于决策者和从业人员从定义概念转变为为FPHS计划和服务获得可持续资金提供帮助将是有用的。在单独的窗口中打开。图1-基础公共卫生服务模型。注意。 HD =卫生部门;人力资源=人力资源; IT?=?信息技术; QI =质量改进。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号