首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Internal Medicine >Significance of G Test [(1-3)-β-D-Glucan Assay] in the Diagnosis and Guidance of Clinical Medication of Invasive Fungal Infection
【24h】

Significance of G Test [(1-3)-β-D-Glucan Assay] in the Diagnosis and Guidance of Clinical Medication of Invasive Fungal Infection

机译:G试验[(1-3)-β-D-葡聚糖检测]在侵袭性真菌感染的诊断和临床用药指导中的意义

获取原文
       

摘要

Objective: G test [(1-3)-β-D-glucan assay] was a novel texting method for invasive fungal infection (IFI). The study evaluated the diagnostic value of G test for IFI by comparing G test with fungal culture method, and analyze the guiding significance of G test and fungal culture in clinical medication. Methods: 373 inpatients with suspected IFI in the first affiliated hospital of Jinan university from January to December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. G test and fungal culture results were collected, and their positive rate, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were calculated. The value and rationality of G test for clinical diagnosis of IFI was evaluated by taking the relief and cure of infection symptoms of patients as clinical effective criteria. Results: Among 373 suspected IFI patients, the positive rate of G experiment was 39.95%, higher than that of fungus culture (28.95%, P0.001). The positive rate of combined G test and fungal culture was 43.70%. To evaluate the consistency of G test with fungal culture method, κ value was 0.596 (P0.001). When positive fungal culture was used as the criterion for the diagnosis of IFI, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of G test for the diagnosis of IFI were 87.04%, 79.25%, 63.09% and 93.75%, respectively. All 373 patients with IFI received antifungal therapy, and the effective rate of the both methods positive group was 72.34%, higher than 42.86% in the only fungal culture positive group (P=0.033) and 30.48% in the both methods negative group (P0.001). The effective rate of the only G test positive group was 58.18%, higher than that of the both methods negative group (30.48%, P0.001). There was no significant difference in the therapeutic efficiency between the only G test positive group and the only fungal culture positive group (P=0.303). Conclusion: G test was an effective diagnostic method of IFI, and combined with fungal culture could improve its positive rate and have a higher guiding value for clinical medication.
机译:目的:G试验[(1-3)-β-D-葡聚糖测定]是一种新型的侵袭性真菌感染(IFI)发短信方法。本研究通过将G检验与真菌培养方法进行比较,评估了G检验对IFI的诊断价值,并分析了G检验和真菌培养在临床药物中的指导意义。方法:回顾性分析2017年1月至2017年12月在暨南大学第一附属医院住院的373名疑似IFI患者。收集G检验和真菌培养结果,并计算它们的阳性率,敏感性,特异性,阳性和阴性预测值。以缓解和治愈患者感染症状为临床有效标准,评价了G检验在IFI临床诊断中的价值和合理性。结果:在373例疑似IFI患者中,G实验的阳性率为39.95%,高于真菌培养的阳性率(28.95%,P <0.001)。 G测试和真菌培养相结合的阳性率为43.70%。用真菌培养法评价G检验的一致性,κ值为0.596(P <0.001)。当以阳性真菌培养作为IFI的诊断标准时,G检验对IFI的敏感性,特异性,阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为87.04%,79.25%,63.09%和93.75%。 373例IFI患者均接受了抗真菌治疗,两种方法阳性组的有效率为72.34%,高于唯一的真菌培养阳性组的有效率为42.86%(P = 0.033),两种方法阴性组的有效率为30.48%(P <0.001)。唯一的G检验阳性组的有效率为58.18%,高于两种方法阴性组的有效率(30.48%,P <0.001)。唯一的G试验阳性组和唯一的真菌培养阳性组之间的治疗效率没有显着差异(P = 0.303)。结论:G试验是一种有效的IFI诊断方法,结合真菌培养可以提高其阳性率,对临床用药具有较高的指导价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号