首页> 外文期刊>Acta anaesthesiologica Taiwanica : >Use of laryngeal mask airway in children with upper respiratory tract infection, compared with face mask: Randomized, single blind, clinical trial
【24h】

Use of laryngeal mask airway in children with upper respiratory tract infection, compared with face mask: Randomized, single blind, clinical trial

机译:与面罩相比,上呼吸道感染患儿使用喉罩气道:随机,单盲,临床试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: The incidence of postoperative cough (primary outcome) and adverse respiratory events (secondary outcome) in children who received anesthesia by laryngeal mask airway (LMA) with children who received anesthesia by face mask (FM) was compared in a blind randomized trial with uncomplicated upper respiratory track infection (URI) undergoing general anesthesia. Previous studies of pediatric patients with URI receiving anesthesia by endotracheal tube have reported a greater number of anesthetic complications; however reports concerning adverse effects in pediatric patients with URI receiving anesthesia by LMA or FM are scanty. Method: For the present trial, 150 children with uncomplicated URI and requiring general anesthesia for ophthalmic procedures were enrolled. Once the severity of preoperative URI symptoms was stratified, the children were randomized to receive general anesthesia by FM or LMA. Anesthesia was induced with sevoflurane and nitrous oxide in oxygen (N"2O in O"2). Respiratory adverse events were evaluated peri- and post-operatively. Results: The two groups did not differ in age, weight, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status, sex, duration of surgery or severity of URI symptoms. The incidences of cough (19% in LMA vs. 42% in FM), vomiting (4% in LMA vs. 12% in FM) and intervention to maintain the patency of the airway were statistically higher in the FM group (p<0.05). There were no differences between the two groups with respect to the incidences of apnea, laryngospasm, desaturation, bronchospasm, readmission and sore throat. Conclusion: In children with uncomplicated URI, the administration of inhalation anesthetics in general anesthesia by LMA is likely to cause fewer adverse events than the use of FM.
机译:目的:在一项盲法随机对照试验中,比较了通过喉罩气道(LMA)进行麻醉的儿童与通过面罩(FM)进行麻醉的儿童的术后咳嗽(主要结局)和不良呼吸事件(继发性结果)的发生率。进行全身麻醉的不复杂的上呼吸道感染(URI)。先前对有URI的小儿URI患者通过气管插管进行麻醉的研究报道了更多的麻醉并发症。然而,关于LMA或FM麻醉的URI小儿患者不良反应的报道很少。方法:在本试验中,招募了150名儿童,他们的URI不复杂,需要对眼科手术进行全身麻醉。一旦对术前URI症状的严重程度进行分层,就将儿童随机分为FM或LMA接受全身麻醉。用七氟醚和一氧化二氮在氧气中(N” 2O在O” 2中)诱导麻醉。围手术期和术后评估呼吸不良事件。结果:两组在年龄,体重,美国麻醉医师学会(ASA)的身体状况,性别,手术时间或URI症状的严重程度方面无差异。 FM组咳嗽(LMA为19%,FM为42%),呕吐(LMA为4%,FM为12%)和维持呼吸道通畅的干预发生率在统计学上较高(p <0.05 )。两组在呼吸暂停,喉痉挛,去饱和,支气管痉挛,再入院和咽喉痛的发生率方面没有差异。结论:对于没有URI的儿童,通过LMA在全身麻醉中实施吸入麻醉可能比使用FM引起的不良事件更少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号