...
首页> 外文期刊>African Journal of Business Management >An empirical study on comparing total quality management (TQM) items of national quality award applicants in Slovenia
【24h】

An empirical study on comparing total quality management (TQM) items of national quality award applicants in Slovenia

机译:斯洛文尼亚国家质量奖申请人的总体质量管理(TQM)项目比较的实证研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The purpose of this paper is to study the differences in total quality management (TQM) items of the companies taking part in Slovenian national quality award - Slovenian business excellence prize (SBEP) and other large companies in Slovenia. This paper reports on the research findings of a study conducted in 110 large Slovenian companies regarding their approach to systematic quality improvement process. The differences in the use of quality management approaches and tools were studied in three groups of companies: a group of “top companies" (according to their financial results), a randomly chosen group of companies and SBEP applicants. Multivariate analysis was used to analyze the items of the sample and to compare the differences among the groups. The results of this research are specific for large companies from Slovenia and analysis is cross sectional. Further research could be done in small and medium enterprises (SMEs) and public sector. A longitudinal study could be conducted in order to verify additional knowledge related to the causal relationship between applying for the quality award and TQM item. The main contribution of the study is to demonstrate affects of systematic implementation of quality improvement process based on research results of the SBEP applicants compared to the other groups of companies. The research results comparing two clusters of companies showed significantly better results for Cluster 1, which consisted of 59% of SBEP applicants including all SBEP finalists and winners, as compared to other companies included in the research. The main differences between two clusters in favour of Cluster 1 were related to the: proposals for improvements, non material recognition, self-assessment, national quality award participation, benchmarking, knowledge and best practice exchange as well as employee satisfaction. The findings from the research have been used for further strategic activities of the SBEP and are expected to help by supporting quality and business excellence development initiatives in Europe and worldwide. This paper analyses TQM items of the SBEP applicants in comparison to the other group of companies and provides a descriptive reference that can be used for evaluation of quality improvement development in large companies.
机译:本文的目的是研究参加斯洛文尼亚国家质量奖(斯洛文尼亚卓越企业奖(SBEP))的公司与斯洛文尼亚其他大公司在总体质量管理(TQM)项目上的差异。本文报告了在110家斯洛文尼亚大型公司中进行的一项有关系统质量改进过程的研究结果。在三组公司中研究了质量管理方法和工具使用上的差异:一组“顶级公司”(根据其财务业绩),一组随机选择的公司和SBEP申请人,并使用多变量分析进行了分析。这项研究的结果是针对斯洛文尼亚的大公司的,分析是横断面的,可以在中小企业(SME)和公共部门中进行进一步的研究。为了验证与质量授予申请和TQM项目之间因果关系相关的附加知识,可以进行纵向研究,该研究的主要贡献是根据SBEP的研究结果来证明系统实施质量改进过程的影响申请人与其他公司的比较。两个公司集群的研究结果显示与研究中包括的其他公司相比,第1组的结果要好得多,该组由SBEP申请人(包括所有SBEP决赛入围者和获胜者)组成的59%。支持群集1的两个群集之间的主要区别在于:改进建议,非实质性认可,自我评估,国家质量奖参与,基准测试,知识和最佳实践交流以及员工满意度。该研究的结果已用于SBEP的进一步战略活动,并有望通过支持欧洲和全球范围内的质量和业务卓越发展计划而有所帮助。本文分析了SBEP申请人与其他公司集团的TQM项目,并提供了可用于评估大公司质量改进发展的描述性参考。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号