...
首页> 外文期刊>African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development >Survey of informal milk retailers in Nairobi, Kenya and prevalence of aflatoxin M1 in marketed milk
【24h】

Survey of informal milk retailers in Nairobi, Kenya and prevalence of aflatoxin M1 in marketed milk

机译:肯尼亚内罗毕的非正式牛奶零售商的调查以及市售牛奶中黄曲霉毒素M1的流行

获取原文
           

摘要

Aflatoxins are toxic by-products of fungi contaminating maize and other crops; they can be carried over into milk, meat and eggs when livestock eat aflatoxin-contaminated feed or fodder. People who consume such animal products are exposed to the toxins. To assess the aflatoxin contamination status in marketed raw milk and associated risk factors in peri-urban Nairobi, we conducted a census of raw milk retailers in Dagoretti Division, Nairobi, Kenya. Structured questionnaires were filled in by face-to-face interviews with all retailers who agreed to participate in this study. Small portions of milk were purchased from each respondent and tested for aflatoxin M1 (AFM1) using competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (cELISA) tests. Geographic coordinates of each eligible retailer were recorded. A total of 350 milk retailers were visited and 344 were plotted on a map. Of these, 250 retailers answered the questionnaire and a milk sample from each of 200 retailers underwent cELISA analysis for AFM1. Four types of businesses were found: kiosks (71%), dairy shops (21%), street or mobile vendors (3%) and grocery stands (1%); for 4% the business type was not identified. Milk was mainly sourced directly from dairy farms (59%) or from intermediate distributors (35%). Most retailers sold less than 20 litres per day of raw milk. The mean daily milk consumption of the milk retailers’ households was 940 ml for adults and 729 ml for children. Although 58% of retailers had heard about aflatoxins and the majority of them agreed that aflatoxins could be present in milk, only 29% believed that “milk safety cannot be solely judged by sight or taste” and only 6% that “milk is not completely safe even after boiling”. The cELISA test found the mean concentration of AFM1 was 128.7 parts per trillion (ppt) (median=49.9; 95% confidence interval=3.0–822.8) with a maximum of 1675 ppt. Overall, 55% of samples exceeded the European Union maximum level of 50 ppt and 6% exceeded the recommended maximum level of the United States Food and Drug Administration of 500 ppt. Compared to milk from street vendors, a significantly higher amount of AFM1 was detected in milk from kiosks and dairy shops, especially when the milk was sourced from farms without an intermediate distributor. Our findings indicate the need to better understand and manage aflatoxin in milk in Nairobi.
机译:黄曲霉毒素是真菌的有毒副产品,污染了玉米和其他农作物。当牲畜食用受黄曲霉毒素污染的饲料或饲料时,它们可以被带入牛奶,肉和蛋。食用此类动物产品的人会接触到毒素。为了评估内罗毕周边市售生乳中黄曲霉毒素的污染状况以及相关的危险因素,我们在肯尼亚内罗毕的达戈雷蒂分部进行了一次生乳零售商普查。通过对所有同意参加这项研究的零售商进行面对面的访谈来填写结构化的问卷。从每个应答者购买一小部分牛奶,并使用竞争性酶联免疫吸附测定(cELISA)测试来检测黄曲霉毒素M1(AFM1)。记录每个合格零售商的地理坐标。总共访问了350家牛奶零售商,并在地图上绘制了344家。其中,有250位零售商回答了问卷,并且对200位零售商中的每位零售商的牛奶样本进行了AFM1的cELISA分析。发现了四种类型的企业:报亭(71%),乳品店(21%),街头或流动摊贩(3%)和杂货店(1%);对于4%的企业类型未确定。牛奶主要来自奶牛场(59%)或中间分销商(35%)。大多数零售商每天出售的生奶少于20升。牛奶零售商家庭的平均每日牛奶消费量为成人940毫升,儿童729毫升。尽管58%的零售商听说过黄曲霉毒素,并且大多数人同意黄曲霉毒素可以存在于牛奶中,但只有29%的零售商认为“不能仅凭视觉或口味来判断牛奶安全性”,只有6%的人认为“牛奶并不完全是黄牛奶毒”。即使煮沸也很安全。” cELISA测试发现,AFM1的平均浓度为128.7份/万亿(ppt)(中位数= 49.9; 95%置信区间= 3.0-822.8),最大值为1675 ppt。总体而言,有55%的样品超过了欧盟最高限值50 ppt,有6%的样品超过了美国食品和药物管理局建议的最高含量500 ppt。与街头摊贩的牛奶相比,售货亭和奶牛场的牛奶中检测到的AFM1含量高得多,尤其是当牛奶来自没有中间分销商的农场时。我们的研究结果表明有必要更好地了解和管理内罗毕牛奶中的黄曲霉毒素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号