首页> 外文期刊>Advances in Interventional Cardiology: Postepy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej >Comparison of transesophageal and intracardiac echocardiography in guiding percutaneous left atrial appendage closure with an Amplatzer Amulet device
【24h】

Comparison of transesophageal and intracardiac echocardiography in guiding percutaneous left atrial appendage closure with an Amplatzer Amulet device

机译:经食管和心脏内超声心动图在使用Amplatzer Amulet装置引导经皮左心耳阑尾闭合中的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction Percutaneous occlusion of the left atrial appendage (LAAO) is becoming an extensively used method of stroke prevention in individuals with contraindications to oral anticoagulants. Transesophageal echocardiography (TOE) is the gold standard for LAAO guiding, but intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) appears to be a potential alternative. Aim To compare the LAAO procedure guided by TOE or ICE with respect to procedural success and safety. Material and methods TOE-guided LAAO was performed in 12 patients and ICE-guided LAAO in 11 patients. ICE was performed using an 8F AcuNav probe and the ACUSON SC2000 system. For LAAO the Amplatzer Amulet was used. After 1 month TOE was performed. Results Procedural success was achieved in all patients in TOE and ICE groups. There was 1 complication (groin hematoma). The procedure time was significantly longer in the TOE group (43 to 80 min; median: 54 min) compared to the ICE group (28 to 67 min; median: 45 min), (p = 0.02) The time needed to puncture the interatrial septum and time needed to remove the sheath did not differ between groups. Fluoroscopic time was insignificantly longer in the ICE group (9.91 ±4.01s) compared to the TOE group (7.69 ±3.21s), and a significantly larger contrast media volume was used in the ICE group (30.00 ±6.67 ml vs. 40.45 ±23.18 ml, p = 0.03). There were no statistically significant differences in the results between TOE and ICE groups in follow-up assessments. Conclusions LAAO using the Amplatzer Amulet may be successfully and safely guided by ICE. ICE offered shorter procedure time and similar results irrespectively of left atrial appendage anatomy compared to TOE guidance.
机译:前言左心耳(LAAO)的经皮阻塞正在成为口服抗凝剂禁忌症患者中广泛使用的卒中预防方法。经食道超声心动图(TOE)是LAAO指导的金标准,但心内超声心动图(ICE)似乎是一种潜在的替代方法。目的比较TOE或ICE指导的LAAO程序在程序成功与安全方面的情况。材料和方法12例患者进行了TOE指导的LAAO,11例患者进行了ICE指导的LAAO。 ICE使用8F AcuNav探针和ACUSON SC2000系统进行。对于LAAO,使用了Amplatzer护身符。 1个月后进行TOE。结果TOE和ICE组的所有患者均获得了手术成功。有1例并发症(腹股沟血肿)。与ICE组(28至67分钟;中位数:45分钟)相比,TOE组(43至80分钟;中位数:54分钟)的手术时间明显更长(p = 0.02)。两组之间的间隔和移除护套所需的时间没有差异。与TOE组(7.69±3.21s)相比,ICE组的荧光检查时间(9.91±4.01s)显着延长,并且ICE组使用的造影剂体积明显更大(30.00±6.67 ml vs. 40.45±23.18)。 ml,p = 0.03)。在随访评估中,TOE组和ICE组之间的结果没有统计学上的显着差异。结论ICE可以成功,安全地指导使用Amplatzer护身符的LAAO。与TOE指南相比,无论左心耳解剖结构如何,ICE都可以缩短手术时间并获得相似的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号