...
首页> 外文期刊>Advances in Interventional Cardiology: Postepy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej >Symptomatic and silent atrial fibrillation recurrences after PVI ablation – usefulness of prolonged 7-day Holter recordings. One-center observation
【24h】

Symptomatic and silent atrial fibrillation recurrences after PVI ablation – usefulness of prolonged 7-day Holter recordings. One-center observation

机译:PVI消融后有症状和无症状的心房颤动复发–延长7天动态心电记录的有用性。一中心观察

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction Atrial fibrillation (AF), especially its paroxysmal form (paroxysmal atrial fibrillation – PAF), is still the most common arrhythmia observed in cardiological practice. It is well known that some diseases may predispose patients to PAF occurrence – such as hypertension, coronary artery disease, valvular heart disease, congestive heart failure, pericarditis, thyrotoxic heart disease, sinus node disease, but also hypokalemia and alcohol overconsumption. However, especially in younger individuals, arrhythmia may occur without any evidenced disease or reason. It should be emphasized that up to 30–40% of episodes are completely asymptomatic (silent atrial fibrillation), and there are some data indicating that this form of PAF is especially often observed in patients after ablation procedures. Cardiac denervation caused by ablation is probably responsible for this phenomenon. These observations seem to be very important, because catheter ablation, according to the latest European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines, has become a?preferable and commonly used method of treatment, especially in young and highly symptomatic patients with drug refractory arrhythmia [1]. Some different ablation strategies were proposed, but pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is a?cornerstone of AF ablation, nowadays. Unfortunately, reconnections of PV-atrium junctions and/or non-pulmonary localization of AF trigger may be responsible for limitation of the ablation success rate. Absolute effectiveness of PVI in patients with PAF is still not well known because studies based on the follow-up using only the clinical symptoms have a?limited value [2, 3]. More precise data might be obtained with the use of long-term continuous ECG recordings, e.g. several-day Holter recordings or tele-ECG methods. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare results obtained from 1-day and continuous 7-day Holter recordings performed in patients with PAF in regard to relapses of arrhythmia after PVI. Aim We estimated the presence of PAF and the correlation between symptoms and arrhythmia recurrences. Material and methods We prospectively observed 102 highly symptomatic patients with drug-refractory PAF (at least 2–3 antiarrhythmic agents were used in history) or with intolerance of antiarrhythmic drugs, qualified for PVI in the years 2014–2016. All of these patients were treated by radiofrequency point-by-point circumferential pulmonary...
机译:简介心房颤动(AF),尤其是阵发性房颤(阵发性心房颤动– PAF),仍然是心脏病实践中最常见的心律不齐。众所周知,某些疾病可能使患者容易发生PAF-例如高血压,冠状动脉疾病,瓣膜性心脏病,充血性心力衰竭,心包炎,甲状腺毒性心脏病,窦房结疾病,以及低钾血症和饮酒过量。但是,尤其是在年轻人中,心律失常可能会在没有任何明显疾病或原因的情况下发生。应该强调的是,多达30%至40%的发作完全无症状(无症状的房颤),并且有一些数据表明这种形式的PAF在消融手术后的患者中尤其常见。消融引起的心脏去神经可能是造成这种现象的原因。这些观察结果似乎非常重要,因为根据最新的欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)指南,导管消融已成为一种首选且常用的治疗方法,尤其是在患有药物难治性心律不齐的年轻和症状严重的患者中[1] ]。提出了一些不同的消融策略,但如今,肺静脉隔离(PVI)是AF消融的基础。不幸的是,PV-心房连接的重新连接和/或AF触发的非肺定位可能是导致消融成功率受限的原因。 PVI在PAF患者中的绝对疗效仍不为人所知,因为仅根据临床症状进行的随访研究的价值有限[2,3]。使用长期连续ECG记录(例如,几天的动态心电图记录或远程ECG方法。因此,本研究的目的是比较从PAF患者1天和连续7天动态心电图记录中获得的关于PVI后心律失常复发的结果。目的我们估计PAF的存在以及症状与心律失常复发之间的相关性。材料和方法我们前瞻性观察了2014年至2016年间102例具有高症状的难治性PAF患者(历史上至少使用2至3种抗心律不齐药物)或抗心律不齐药物,这些患者具有PVI资格。所有这些患者均接受了射频逐点圆周肺...

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号