...
首页> 外文期刊>Advances in Medical Education and Practice >An evaluative study of objective structured clinical examination (OSCE): students and examiners perspectives
【24h】

An evaluative study of objective structured clinical examination (OSCE): students and examiners perspectives

机译:客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)的评估研究:学生和考官的观点

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: The objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) is the gold standard and universal format to assess the clinical competence of medical students in a comprehensive, reliable and valid manner. The clinical competence is assessed by a team of many examiners on various stations of the examination. Therefore, it is found to be a more complex, resource- and time-intensive assessment exercise compared to the traditional examinations. Purpose: The objective of this study was to determine the final year MBBS students’ and OSCE examiners’ perception on the attributes, quality, validity, reliability and organization of the Medicine and Therapeutics exit OSCE held at the University of the West Indies (Cave Hill) in June 2017. Methods: At the end of the OSCE, students and examiners were provided with a questionnaire to obtain their views and comments about the OSCE. Due to the ordinal level of data produced by the Likert scale survey, statistical analysis was performed using the median, IQR and chi-square. Results: A total of 52 students and 22 examiners completed the questionnaire. The majority of the students provided positive views regarding the attributes (eg, fairness, administration, structure, sequence, and coverage of knowledge/clinical skills), quality (eg, awareness, instructions, tasks, and sequence of stations), validity and reliability (eg, true measure of essential clinical skills, standardized, practical and useful experiences), and organization (eg, orientation, timetable, announcements and quality of examination rooms) of the OSCE. Similarly, majority of the examiners expressed their satisfaction with organization, administration and process of OSCE. However, students expressed certain concerns such as stressful environment and difficulty level of OSCE. Conclusion: Overall, the OSCE was perceived very positively and welcomed by both the students and examiners. The concerns and challenges regarding OSCE can be overcome through better orientation of the faculty and preparation of the students for the OSCE.
机译:背景:客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)是金标准和通用格式,用于以全面,可靠和有效的方式评估医学生的临床能力。临床能力由许多检查员组成的团队在各个检查站进行评估。因此,与传统的考试相比,它是一种更为复杂,耗费资源和时间的评估活动。目的:本研究的目的是确定在西印度群岛大学(Cave Hill)举行的MBBS学生和OSCE考官对医学和治疗学专业OSCE的属性,质量,有效性,可靠性和组织的最后一年的看法)。方法:在欧安组织结束时,向学生和考官提供了一份问卷,以征询他们对欧安组织的看法和意见。由于李克特量表调查产生的顺序数据水平,因此使用中位数,IQR和卡方进行了统计分析。结果:共有52名学生和22名考官完成了问卷。大多数学生对属性(例如,公平,管理,结构,顺序和知识/临床技能的覆盖范围),质量(例如,意识,指示,任务和站位顺序),属性(有效性和可靠性)提供了积极的看法(例如,对基本临床技能,标准化,实践和有用经验的真实衡量)以及OSCE的组织(例如,方向,时间表,宣告和检查室的质量)。同样,大多数审查员对欧安组织的组织,行政管理和程序表示满意。但是,学生们表达了一些担忧,例如压力环境和欧安组织的困难程度。结论:总体而言,欧安组织非常积极地受到了学生和考官的欢迎。通过更好地指导教师和为OSCE培养学生,可以克服有关OSCE的担忧和挑战。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号