Carotid sinus hypersensitivity syncope: is there a possible alternative approach to pacemaker implantation in young patients?

摘要

Introduction Carotid sinus hypersensitivity (CSH) is frequently found in about one third of elderly patients with syncope and trauma, but it may also be a common finding in younger patients. Pacemaker implantation is recommended in patients with recurrent syncope once CSH has been recognised. Cardioneuroablation (CNA) has been reported as an effective treatment in cardioinhibitory syncope [1, 2]. A few reports are currently available in neurally mediated syncope and functional atrioventricular block [3, 4], but no previous experiences are available in carotid sinus hypersensitivity syncope. Case report A 42-year-old female patient, with normal heart and no relevant medical history, was referred to our centre for recurrent CSH syncope. As the patient refused PM implantation, autonomic nervous system modulation through CNA was proposed. At the basic EP study normal atrioventricular conduction parameters (AH 68 ms, HV 50 ms) were documented; during CSM a sinus arrest of up to 5.4 s occurred. Electroanatomical mapping of the right atrium with identification of phrenic nerve course was performed (Figure 1 A). Anterior right CNA (35 W, 43°C, 2 min and 40 s of RF delivery) at the level of the septal aspect of the superior vena cava determined a shortening of the basal sinus cycle length (from 975 ms to 730 ms). Vagal stimulation by manual CSM did not cause any pause. After 20 min, a new CSM showed suprahisian atrioventricular block with normal HV (RR max of 2608 ms) (Figure 1 B). Inferior right CNA (35 W, 43°C, 1 min and 30 s of RF delivery) posterior to the coronary sinus ostium was performed, in a region previously reported to be involved in AV conduction neuromodulation (located between the inferior vena cava and the right/left atrium) [1–3]. At CSM after RF and after 30 min of observation no longer pathological pauses were documented (RR max 1.4 s). Shorter AV conduction intervals were observed (AH 48 ms, HV 50 ms). At 6-month follow-up the patient is still asymptomatic for syncope and dizziness. Ablation lesions were performed using an anatomical approach (without AF-Nest mapping); no pharmacological test was performed to confirm the denervation; only right atrial CNA was performed in order to minimize the risk of complications; a longer follow-up period is needed to confirm ablation results. Conclusions The CNA restricted to the right atrium, if properly standardized, could be an attractive and safer... View full text...