首页> 外文期刊>Advances in BioResearch >Planned home compared with planned hospital births: mode of delivery and Safety measures and outcome
【24h】

Planned home compared with planned hospital births: mode of delivery and Safety measures and outcome

机译:计划回家与计划生育的比较:分娩方式,安全措施和结果

获取原文
           

摘要

To compare the mode of delivery and Safety measures between planned home versus planned hospital delivery and to determine if differences in intervention rates and out come.At current, obstetric care in Saudi Arabia has a highly medicalized maternity care. Unfortunately, intervention rates are unacceptably high with a still rising rates for cesarean sections) and a completely normal physiologic birth a rarity. Data was collected by a questionnaire about Intervention and safety We enrolled only women expecting their first birth so that their previous birth experiences would not affect their preferences and outcomes. Recruitment in midwifery practices was carried out from March 2017 to feburary 2018 and in hospitals from March 2017 to December 2017.Besides adjustment for maternal and care factors, we included for additional casemix adjustment: presence of congenital anomaly , small for gestational age, preterm birth, or low Apgar score. The techniques used were nested multiple stepwise, and stratified analysis for separate risk groups. The women who previously have been delivered (inadvertently) at PHCs found it more comfortable and pleasant experience and wished (66.7%) to have next delivery in midwifery led centers. the women who gave birth to their babies in obstetrician led maternity hospitals were satisfied and opted (90%) the same for their next delivery. Women are felling safe and comfortable to have a hospital delivery and having good neonatal care how ever few less than ten percent women like to have home deliver or mid wife setting.
机译:为了比较计划的家庭和计划的医院分娩之间的分娩方式和安全措施,并确定干预率和出院率是否存在差异。当前,沙特阿拉伯的产科护理具有高度医疗化的产科护理。不幸的是,干预率很高,剖宫产率仍在上升,而完全正常的生理分娩很少。通过问卷调查收集有关干预和安全性的数据。我们仅招募那些希望初生的妇女,以便她们以前的生育经历不会影响她们的偏好和结局。 2017年3月至2018年2月以及2017年3月至2017年12月在医院进行了助产士招募,除了对产妇和护理因素的调整外,我们还进行了其他病例组合调整:先天性异常,胎龄少,早产,或Apgar分数低。所使用的技术分步嵌套,并针对单独的风险组进行分层分析。以前曾在(不经意间)在初级卫生保健中心分娩的妇女感到更加舒适和愉快,并希望(66.7%)在助产士领导的分娩中心再次分娩。在妇产科领导的妇产医院生下孩子的妇女对下次分娩感到满意并选择(90%)。妇女在分娩时安全,舒适,并且拥有良好的新生儿护理,但是很少有不到百分之十的妇女喜欢分娩或中产。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号