首页> 外文期刊>Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica >Middle-term therapeutic effect of the sacroiliac joint blockade in patients with lumbosacral fusion-related sacroiliac pain
【24h】

Middle-term therapeutic effect of the sacroiliac joint blockade in patients with lumbosacral fusion-related sacroiliac pain

机译:joint关节融合引起的sa关节疼痛患者Middle关节阻滞的中期治疗效果

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the therapeutic effect of sacroiliac (SI) blockade in patients with and without lumbosacral fusion. Methods: This study included 72 patients diagnosed with SI pain and who received blockade injection (methylprednisolone and lidocaine). Patients were divided into 2 groups; 22 patients in the fusion group who underwent previous lumbosacral fusion and 50 patients in the non-fusion group. Average follow-up was 17.7 (range: 6 to 30) months. All patients were evaluated before and after intervention using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index, Rivermead Mobility Index and SF-36. Results were statistically analyzed. Results: Activity pain (a component of VAS) was significantly better in the non-fusion group than the fusion group (p=0.042). No other statistically significant differences were observed between groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: Sacroiliac blockade has a similar therapeutic effect on patients who underwent lumbosacral fusion surgery as on non-operated patients in the middle-term. Therefore, alternative treatment options are not necessary in patients with fusion.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是比较of骨(SI)阻滞在有或没有腰s融合术中的治疗效果。方法:本研究包括72名被诊断为SI疼痛并接受了注射阻断剂(甲基泼尼松龙和利多卡因)的患者。患者分为两组。融合组中有22例曾接受腰融合术,非融合组中有50例患者。平均随访17.7个月(范围:6至30个月)。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS),Oswestry残疾指数,Rivermead流动指数和SF-36对所有患者进行干预前后的评估。对结果进行统计分析。结果:非融合组的活动性疼痛(VAS的一个组成部分)明显好于融合组(p = 0.042)。两组之间未观察到其他统计学显着差异(p> 0.05)。结论:Sa骨阻滞对接受腰s融合手术的患者的中期疗效与非手术患者相似。因此,融合患者无需选择其他治疗方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号