首页> 外文期刊>A+BE : Architecture and the Built Environment >Performance measurement of workplace change: in two different cultural contexts
【24h】

Performance measurement of workplace change: in two different cultural contexts

机译:工作场所变化的绩效衡量:两种不同的文化背景

获取原文
           

摘要

Nowadays, organisations must cope with the pressure of cost reduction and efficiency in order to succeed in a highly competitive business environment. However, drivers to improve social interaction and employee’s performance and as such to contribute to organisational goals and objectives make it necessary to be concerned with other performance criteria as well, such as effectiveness, flexibility, employee satisfaction, productivity and creativity. There is a growing need for performance management and performance measurement that not only covers all aspects of an organisation, but which can be applied to various situations in a changing internal and external environment. Performance measurement methods which include an integrated perspective of performance have become essential. In addition, it has been realised that corporate real estate can contribute to organisational performance (Nourse and Roulac, 1993, De Vries et al., 2008, Lindholm, 2008, Den Heijer, 2011, Jensen et al., 2012). For this reason, worldwide organisations started to implement new ways of working in a more open and flexible work environment. Although there are various objectives and drivers of workplace change, the common objectives are to reduce costs and to increase efficiency. The changing organisational and external contexts, such as the increasing demand for talented knowledge workers and changing work patterns, have led to the development of new offices that can promote social networks and interaction among employees. The new workplace does not only aim at achieving cost efficiency, but it should also support employee satisfaction and productivity. This PhD research focuses on both themes i.e. performance measurement of workplace change. The aim of this research is to provide a conceptual framework that visualises the impact of workplace change on employees’ responses to the new work environment and to present guidelines on performance measurement of workplace change in different contexts. Two organisations in Thailand and one organisation in The Netherlands were selected to serve as case studies. The impact of culture was explored as a contextual background. Research methods Based on literature review an overview of performance measurement systems and measures has been developed. The list of corporate real estate performance measures has been classified in six categories according to Bradley (2002) and subsequently compared with the findings from the case studies. The six categories include: 1) stakeholder perception, 2) financial health, 3) organisational development, 4) productivity, 5) environmental responsibility and 6) cost efficiency. The impact of workplace change was examined using the work environment diagnosis instrument (WODI) questionnaire which evaluates employees’ responses to the changed work environment in three areas: employee satisfaction, perceived productivity support and prioritised aspects (Maarleveld, et al., 2009). The Organisational Culture Assessment Instrument (OCAI; Cameron and Quinn, 2006) was used to assess organisational culture. National culture was measured by using the Value Survey Module 94 (VSM94; Hofstede, 1997). Research findings The conceptual framework that came to the fore from the literature review showed to be useful for both theoretical understanding of performance measurement and practical applications. Proposed performance measures have been applied in all three case studies but in different ways. The three case studies showed that performance measurement of an organisation is multi-dimensional. It includes several performance criteria and performance measures beyond cost efficiency. All seven performance criteria mentioned by Sink and Tuttle (1989) have been applied in all three cases including effectiveness, efficiency, quality, productivity, quality of worklife, innovation and profitability. The four perspectives of the Balanced Scorecard (financial, customer, internal business process, learning & growth) are applied in all three cases as well, with different points of focus regarding their business types. The corporate real estate performance measures found in the case studies and classified in the six categories can be aligned with most of the areas of the added value of CREM in the literature and can also be viewed as value dimensions. In all three cases, the performance measures related to human resource management were focused on the occupiers having been provided with an office environment that enables employees to increase their productivity. The findings show that organisation and workplace change characteristics have an influence on the satisfaction of employees. The physical characteristics of workplace change that have influenced different degrees of employee satisfaction include location, building grade, architectural design, workplace concept and supporting facilities. The findings also show a negative impact of workplace design on perceived productivity suppo
机译:如今,组织必须应对降低成本和提高效率的压力,才能在竞争激烈的商业环境中取得成功。但是,要改善社交互动和员工绩效并为组织目标和目标做出贡献的驱动力,就必须同时关注其他绩效标准,例如有效性,灵活性,员工满意度,生产力和创造力。对绩效管理和绩效衡量的需求不断增长,不仅涵盖组织的各个方面,而且可以应用于内部和外部环境变化的各种情况。包括综合绩效观点的绩效衡量方法已变得至关重要。此外,人们已经意识到,公司房地产可以促进组织绩效(Nourse和Roulac,1993; De Vries等,2008; Lindholm,2008; Den Heijer,2011; Jensen等,2012)。因此,全球组织开始在更加开放和灵活的工作环境中实施新的工作方式。尽管有各种各样的目标和工作场所变更的驱动因素,但共同的目标是降低成本和提高效率。组织和外部环境的变化,例如对人才人才的需求不断增加和工作模式的变化,导致了新办公室的发展,可以促进社交网络和员工之间的互动。新的工作场所不仅旨在实现成本效益,而且还应支持员工满意度和生产力。该博士研究专注于两个主题,即工作场所变更的绩效评估。这项研究的目的是提供一个概念框架,使工作场所变化对员工对新工作环境的反应的影响可视化,并提出在不同情况下衡量工作场所变化的绩效的准则。选择了泰国的两个组织和荷兰的一个组织作为案例研究。探讨了文化的影响作为背景背景。研究方法基于文献综述,对性能评估系统和措施进行了概述。根据布拉德利(Bradley,2002),将公司房地产绩效评估的清单分为六类,随后与案例研究的结果进行了比较。六个类别包括:1)利益相关者的看法,2)财务状况,3)组织发展,4)生产力,5)环境责任和6)成本效率。使用工作环境诊断工具(WODI)问卷调查了工作场所变更的影响,该问卷在三个方面评估员工对变化的工作环境的反应:员工满意度,感知的生产力支持和优先考虑的方面(Maarleveld等,2009)。组织文化评估工具(OCAI; Cameron和Quinn,2006)用于评估组织文化。民族文化是通过使用价值调查模块94(VSM94; Hofstede,1997)进行衡量的。研究结果从文献综述中脱颖而出的概念框架显示出对性能测量的理论理解和实际应用都是有用的。拟议的绩效指标已在所有三个案例研究中应用,但采用了不同的方式。这三个案例研究表明,组织的绩效衡量是多维的。除成本效率外,它还包括一些绩效标准和绩效指标。 Sink和Tuttle(1989)提到的所有七个绩效标准已在所有三个案例中应用,包括有效性,效率,质量,生产率,工作生活质量,创新和盈利能力。平衡记分卡的四个视角(财务,客户,内部业务流程,学习与成长)也适用于所有三种情况,其业务类型的重点不同。案例研究中发现的公司房地产绩效衡量标准分为六个类别,可以与文献中CREM附加值的大部分领域保持一致,也可以视为价值维度。在所有这三种情况下,与人力资源管理相关的绩效指标都集中于为员工提供了办公环境,从而使员工能够提高生产率。研究结果表明,组织和工作场所的变化特征对员工的满意度有影响。影响员工满意度不同程度的工作场所变更的物理特征包括位置,建筑物等级,建筑设计,工作场所概念和支持设施。研究结果还表明,工作场所设计对感知的生产力支持有负面影响

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号