首页> 外文期刊>Cureus. >A Survey of Current Practices and Preferences for Internal Fixation of Trochanteric Fractures of the Femur in Brazil
【24h】

A Survey of Current Practices and Preferences for Internal Fixation of Trochanteric Fractures of the Femur in Brazil

机译:巴西股骨粗隆间骨折内固定的现行做法和偏爱调查

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective The primary aim of this study was to survey current practices and preferences behind internal fixation of trochanteric femoral fractures among Brazilian orthopedic surgeons. The secondary aim was to identify the main reason for these preferences. Methods A survey containing 20 images of trochanteric fractures of the femur was presented to a group of 62 orthopedists, all members of the Brazilian Society of Orthopedics and Traumatology (SBOT). The first part of the questionnaire was created to identify the surgeons’ degree of professional experience, type of practice, and areas of greatest interest and performance within the specialty. The second part of the questionnaire contained options for fixating different trochanteric fracture patterns in the femur for participants to choose, along with the main reason for their decision. Statistical analysis was descriptive and profiled the surgeons’ major area of interest, treatment option, and the main reason for their therapeutic decision. Results Of the 62 orthopedists who participated in the study, 10 (16.0%) stated that their area of greatest interest was orthopedic trauma and 52 (83.9%) reported greater interest in another area of the specialty; these two groups were classified as the Trauma Group and Orthopedics Group, respectively. To treat AO 31A1 type fractures, the trauma group selected the sliding hip screw (SHS) in 66.7% of cases, while the orthopedics group chose the SHS in 65.8% of cases. For 31A2 type fractures, the trauma group chose the intramedullary (IM) nail in 64.0% of the cases, while the orthopedics group chose the IM nail in 76.7% of the cases. For 31A3 type fractures, the trauma group opted for the IM nail in 70.0% of the cases, while the orthopedics group selected the IM nail in 88.0% of the cases. The two most important factors in implant selection for the three types of fracture were fracture pattern and implant availability. Conclusion The sliding hip screw is preferred by most Brazilian orthopedic surgeons for fixation of 31A1 type trochanteric femoral fractures. For 31A2 and 31A3 type fractures, the IM nail is preferred.
机译:目的本研究的主要目的是调查巴西整形外科医生对股骨粗隆股骨骨折进行内固定的现行做法和偏好。第二个目的是确定产生这些偏好的主要原因。方法向62位骨科医师(包括巴西骨伤科协会(SBOT)的所有成员)进行了包含20例股骨转子粗隆骨折图像的调查。创建问卷的第一部分是为了确定外科医生的专业经验程度,执业类型以及该专业内最感兴趣和表现最佳的领域。问卷的第二部分包含用于固定股骨转子粗隆骨折类型的选项供参与者选择,以及做出决定的主要原因。统计分析是描述性的,概述了外科医生的主要兴趣领域,治疗选择以及做出治疗决定的主要原因。结果在参与该研究的62位骨科医师中,有10位(16.0%)表示他们最感兴趣的领域是骨科创伤,而52位(83.9%)报告了对该专业另一个领域的更大兴趣。这两个组分别被分类为创伤组和骨科组。为治疗AO 31A1型骨折,创伤组选择了髋关节螺钉(SHS)占66.7%,而骨科组选择了SHS占65.8%。对于31A2型骨折,创伤组选择了64.0%的病例使用了髓内钉,而骨科小组选择了76.7%的病例。对于31A3型骨折,创伤组选择IM钉占70.0%,而骨科组选择IM钉占88.0%。三种类型的骨折在选择种植体时最重要的两个因素是骨折类型和种植体可用性。结论大多数巴西骨科外科医生均首选滑动髋螺钉来固定31A1型股骨转子粗隆骨折。对于31A2和31A3型骨折,首选IM钉。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号