...
首页> 外文期刊>Cureus. >Comparing Real-time Versus Delayed Video Assessments for Evaluating ACGME Sub-competency Milestones in Simulated Patient Care Environments
【24h】

Comparing Real-time Versus Delayed Video Assessments for Evaluating ACGME Sub-competency Milestones in Simulated Patient Care Environments

机译:比较实时与延迟视频评估,以评估模拟患者护理环境中的ACGME次胜任里程碑

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Simulation is an effective method for creating objective summative assessments of resident trainees. Real-time assessment (RTA) in simulated patient care environments is logistically challenging, especially when evaluating a large group of residents in multiple simulation scenarios. To date, there is very little data comparing RTA with delayed (hours, days, or weeks later) video-based assessment (DA) for simulation-based assessments of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) sub-competency milestones. We hypothesized that sub-competency milestone evaluation scores obtained from DA, via audio-video recordings, are equivalent to the scores obtained from RTA. Methods Forty-one anesthesiology residents were evaluated in three separate simulated scenarios, representing different ACGME sub-competency milestones. All scenarios had one faculty member perform RTA and two additional faculty members perform DA. Subsequently, the scores generated by RTA were compared with the average scores generated by DA. Variance component analysis was conducted to assess the amount of variation in scores attributable to residents and raters. Results Paired t-tests showed no significant difference in scores between RTA and averaged DA for all cases. Cases 1, 2, and 3 showed an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.67, 0.85, and 0.50 for agreement between RTA scores and averaged DA scores, respectively. Analysis of variance of the scores assigned by the three raters showed a small proportion of variance attributable to raters (4% to 15%). Conclusions The results demonstrate that video-based delayed assessment is as reliable as real-time assessment, as both assessment methods yielded comparable scores. Based on a department’s needs or logistical constraints, our findings support the use of either real-time or delayed video evaluation for assessing milestones in a simulated patient care environment.
机译:背景模拟是一种有效的方法,可以对驻地学员进行客观的总结性评估。在模拟病人护理环境中的实时评估(RTA)在逻辑上具有挑战性,尤其是在多种模拟场景中评估一大批居民时。迄今为止,很少有数据将RTA与基于延迟的(小时,几天或几周后)基于视频的评估(DA)进行比较,以进行基于模拟的评估,以进行研究生医学教育认可委员会(ACGME)子能力里程碑的评估。我们假设从DA通过音频视频录制获得的子能力里程碑评估分数等于从RTA获得的分数。方法在三个独立的模拟场景中评估了41位麻醉科医师,分别代表了不同的ACGME亚能力里程碑。所有方案都由一名教员执行RTA,另外两名教员执行DA。随后,将RTA生成的分数与DA生成的平均分数进行比较。进行了方差成分分析以评估归因于居民和评估者的分数变化量。结果配对t检验显示,所有病例的RTA和平均DA得分均无显着差异。案例1、2和3的类内相关系数(ICC)分别为RTA得分和平均DA得分之间的一致性,分别为0.67、0.85和0.50。对三个评估者分配的分数的方差分析表明,归因于评估者的方差很小(4%至15%)。结论结果表明,基于视频的延迟评估与实时评估一样可靠,因为两种评估方法均得出可比的分数。根据部门的需求或后勤约束,我们的发现支持使用实时或延迟视频评估来评估模拟患者护理环境中的里程碑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号