首页> 外文期刊>Cureus. >Video Laryngoscopy vs. Direct Laryngoscopy in Teaching Neonatal Endotracheal Intubation: A Simulation-Based Study
【24h】

Video Laryngoscopy vs. Direct Laryngoscopy in Teaching Neonatal Endotracheal Intubation: A Simulation-Based Study

机译:视频喉镜与直接喉镜在新生儿气管内插管教学中的基于模拟的研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Neonatal endotracheal intubation is a life-saving procedural skill where best practices have been developed from expert opinion. Few empirical studies have examined how this skill should be taught. Objective To determine whether a video laryngoscope (VL) assisted intubation training curriculum compared to a traditional direct laryngoscope (DL) assisted curriculum improves neonatal intubation performance of novice intubators in a simulated setting. Methods A randomized trial of novice intubators was conducted at the University of Texas-Houston from 6/2013–8/2013. Eligible candidates were randomly assigned to control group (DL curriculum) or intervention group (VL curriculum). Those in the intervention group received instruction with VL videos and practice with Storz C-MAC??VL (Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany) in addition to a traditional curriculum. Intubation performance was evaluated in a simulated setting using a SimNewB? (Laerdal, NY, USA) manikin and traditional intubation equipment. The number of intubation attempts, outcome of each attempt, and time to successful intubation were recorded. The data was analyzed using Fisher's exact test and logistic regression where appropriate. Results One hundred twenty-three?trainees were enrolled, 62 (50%) in DL group and 61 (50%) in the VL group. Intubation success on first attempt was achieved by 69% (43/62) of the DL group vs. 61% (37/61) of the VL group, P=0.35. Time to successful intubation was 25 sec (interquartile range (IQR) 18, 32) in the DL group and 26.5 sec (IQR 20, 43) in the VL group, P=0.27. Those in the VL group were more likely to need more than two attempts to achieve intubation success, OR=3.09 (95% CI 1.03–9.28). Conclusions In a simulated setting, teaching with a VL curriculum did not improve intubation performance compared to teaching with DL. Further studies are needed to determine if VL-based teaching has an impact on clinical intubation performance.
机译:背景技术新生儿气管插管是一种挽救生命的程序技能,其中专家的意见已开发出最佳实践。很少有实证研究检查应如何教授此技能。目的确定视频喉镜(VL)辅助插管培训课程与传统直接喉镜(DL)辅助课程相比是否在模拟环境中提高了新手插管者的新生儿插管性能。方法从2013年6月6日至2013年8月在德克萨斯州休斯顿大学进行了新手插管的随机试验。将符合条件的候选人随机分配到对照组(DL课程)或干预组(VL课程)。除传统课程外,干预小组的人员还接受了VL视频的指导,并与Storz C-MAC ?? VL(德国图特林根的Karl Storz)一起练习。使用SimNewB?在模拟设置中评估插管性能。 (美国纽约州拉尔达尔)人体模型和传统插管设备。记录插管尝试的次数,每次尝试的结果以及成功插管的时间。在适当的情况下,使用Fisher精确检验和logistic回归分析数据。结果共招募123名学员,DL组62例(50%),VL组61例(50%)。 DL组的首次插管成功率为69%(43/62),而VL组为61%(37/61),P = 0.35。 DL组成功插管的时间为25秒(四分位间距(IQR)18、32),VL组为26.5秒(IQR 20、43),P = 0.27。 VL组的患者更有可能需要两次以上尝试才能成功完成插管,OR = 3.09(95%CI 1.03–9.28)。结论在模拟环境中,与DL相比,使用VL课程的教学不能提高插管性能。需要进一步的研究以确定基于VL的教学是否对临床插管性能有影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号