首页> 外文期刊>Critical Care Research and Practice >Effects of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation of the Quadriceps and Diaphragm in Critically Ill Patients: A Pilot Study
【24h】

Effects of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation of the Quadriceps and Diaphragm in Critically Ill Patients: A Pilot Study

机译:神经肌肉电刺激股四头肌和Dia肌在重症患者中的初步研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Background. Deep and respiratory muscle disorders are commonly observed in critically ill patients. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is an alternative to mobilize and to exercise that does not require active patient participation and can be used on bedridden patients. Objective. Evaluate the effectiveness of the NMES therapy in quadriceps versus diaphragm subjects in mechanical ventilation (MV). Methods. Sixty-seven subjects in MV were included, divided into 3 groups (a) control group (CG, ), (b) stimulation of quadriceps (quadriceps group–QG, ), and (c) stimulation of diaphragm (diaphragm group–DG, ). The QG and DG patients received consecutive daily electrical stimulation sessions at specific points from the first day of randomization until ICU discharge. Respiratory and peripheral muscle strength, MV time, length of hospitalization, and functional independence score (the Functional Status Score-ICU) were recorded. Results. There were studied (QG), (DG), and (CG) patients. Peripheral muscle strength improved significantly in the QG (). Functional independence at ICU discharge was significantly better in QG (), and the QG presented a better Barthel Index compared to DG and CG () and also presented better FSS compared to CG (). Conclusions. Electrical stimulation of quadriceps had best outcomes for peripheral muscle strength compared with controls or electrical stimulation of diaphragm among mechanically ventilated critically ill subjects and promoted functional independence and decreased length of hospitalization.
机译:背景。重症患者通常会观察到深部和呼吸肌疾病。神经肌肉电刺激(NMES)是一种动员和锻炼的替代方法,不需要患者积极参与,可用于卧床不起的患者。目的。在机械通气(MV)中评估NMES治疗四头肌与diaphragm肌对象的有效性。方法。纳入了MV的67位受试者,分为3组(a)对照组(CG,),(b)股四头肌刺激(股四头肌组–QG)和(c)diaphragm肌刺激(膜片组–DG, )。从随机分组的第一天到ICU出院,QG和DG患者在特定时间点连续接受每日电刺激。记录呼吸和周围肌肉的力量,MV时间,住院时间和功能独立性评分(Functional Status Score-ICU)。结果。研究了(QG),(DG)和(CG)患者。 QG()的周围肌肉力量明显改善。 QG()中ICU出院时的功能独立性明显更好,并且与DG和CG()相比,QG的Barthel指数更好,与CG()相比,QS的FSS也更好。结论。在机械通气的危重患者中,股四头肌的电刺激与对照组或diaphragm肌的电刺激相比,对周围肌肉的强度具有最佳效果,并能促进功能独立性并缩短住院时间。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号