首页> 外文期刊>Clinical and Experimental Dental Research >Fit of cobalt?¢????chromium implant frameworks before and after ceramic veneering in comparison with CNC-milled titanium frameworks
【24h】

Fit of cobalt?¢????chromium implant frameworks before and after ceramic veneering in comparison with CNC-milled titanium frameworks

机译:与CNC铣削的钛框架相比,陶瓷镶饰前后钴植入铬框架的适合性

获取原文
           

摘要

Abstract Computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing fabrication of implant-supported frameworks is a standard procedure, and the use of ceramic-veneered cobalt?¢????chromium alloys is increasing. However, no data are available concerning the precision of fit of these frameworks and the impact on the fit of the veneering procedure. The aim of this study was to evaluate the fit of computer numeric-controlled-milled cobalt?¢????chromium and titanium implant frameworks for edentulous maxillas, provided with six implants. An additional aim was to evaluate the effect of ceramic veneering on the fit of the cobalt?¢????chromium frameworks. Ten stone casts simulating an edentulous maxilla provided with six dental implants and abutments were produced. One computer numeric-controlled-milled cobalt?¢????chromium framework and one titanium framework were fabricated for each stone cast. Each stone cast and corresponding titanium and cobalt?¢????chromium framework was measured with a coordinate measuring machine in the three-dimensional ( X axis, Y axis, and Z axis) directions. Both milled titanium and cobalt?¢????chromium frameworks presented a good fit in the vertical plane ( Z axis), 5.3 ???μm for titanium frameworks and 4.6 ???μm for the cobalt?¢????chromium frameworks. The titanium frameworks showed a statistically significant smaller mean degree of misfit in the horizontal plane, X (5.0 ???μm) and Y (2.8 ???μm) axes as compared with the cobalt?¢????chromium frameworks presenting a mean deviation of 13.5 ???μm in X axis and 6.3 ???μm in Y axis ( P < 0.001). After ceramic veneering of the cobalt?¢????chromium frameworks, the horizontal distortion significantly decreased from 13.5 to 9.7 ???μm in X axis ( P = 0.007) and from 6.3 to 4.4 ???μm in Y axis ( P = 0.017). The fit of both titanium and cobalt?¢????chromium frameworks was very good. There were small but significant differences in fit between the titanium and cobalt?¢????chromium frameworks, but the difference is of no clinical significance. The ceramic veneering resulted in a minor but significant improvement of the fit for the cobalt?¢????chromium frameworks.
机译:摘要植入物支撑框架的计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造制造是一种标准程序,并且陶瓷贴面钴钴铬合金的使用正在增加。但是,没有关于这些框架适合的精度以及对饰面程序适合性的影响的数据。这项研究的目的是评估计算机数控铣削钴和铬的钛和钛植入物框架对无牙颌骨的重要性,并提供六种植入物。另一个目的是评估陶瓷饰面对钴铬合金铬框架的适合性的影响。制作了十个模拟无牙上颌的石模,并配有六个牙齿植入物和基台。每个石头铸件都制造了一个计算机数控铣削的钴铬合金框架和一个钛框架。用坐标测量机在三维(X轴,Y轴和Z轴)方向上测量每个铸石以及相应的钛和钴的铬骨架。研磨的钛和钴的铬骨架在垂直平面(Z轴)上都显示出良好的配合,钛骨架为5.3μm,钴铬为4.6μm。构架。钛骨架在水平面,X(5.0μm)和Y(2.8μm)轴上的平均失配度在统计学上显着低于钴铬合金铬骨架。 X轴的平均偏差为13.5μm,Y轴的平均偏差为6.3μm(P <0.001)。在对钴铬合金框架进行陶瓷饰面处理之后,水平变形在X轴上从13.5μm显着减小(P = 0.007),在Y轴上从6.3μm减小到4.4μm(P = 0.007)。 = 0.017)。钛和钴铬合金框架的配合都很好。钛框架和钴铬框架之间的拟合度有微小但显着的差异,但该差异没有临床意义。陶瓷饰面使钴铬合金铬框架的配合度略有改善。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号