首页> 外文期刊>College & Research Libraries >Authorship and the Consideration of Alternatives
【24h】

Authorship and the Consideration of Alternatives

机译:作者和替代方案的考虑

获取原文
       

摘要

Originally, this editorial was intended as a discussion of authorship norms across disciplines—a seemingly harmless topic relevant to academic libraries given libraries provide guidance and access to knowledge in all disciplines and can serve as the linchpin in multi-, inter- or transdisciplinary research. Our explorations, though, led us in a different direction, one that has implications for this journal. Research and scholarship have experienced profound changes across all disciplines. One of the more transformational shifts has been the movement toward more interdisciplinary research and collaborations across subjects and sectors. This necessitates the awareness of and ability to navigate different disciplinary norms and expectations. The scholarly practices of academic communities often have unique values and norms, including the structure and system of rewards; the nature of collaborative, interdependent, and solitary research practices; and the models and norms of authorship and acknowledgment.
机译:最初,此社论旨在讨论各学科的作者身份规范—这似乎与学术图书馆无害,因为图书馆提供了所有学科的指导和知识访问权限,并且可以充当跨学科,跨学科或跨学科研究的关键。但是,我们的探索将我们引向了另一个方向,这对本期刊产生了影响。研究和学术在所有学科中都经历了深刻的变化。更具变革性的转变之一是朝着跨学科和跨学科的跨学科研究和合作的方向发展。这需要对不同学科规范和期望的意识和驾驭能力。学术界的学术实践通常具有独特的价值和规范,包括奖励的结构和制度;合作,相互依存和单独的研究实践的性质;以及作者身份和认可的模式和规范。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号