首页> 外文期刊>Comparative Migration Studies >Relational integration: a response to Willem Schinkel
【24h】

Relational integration: a response to Willem Schinkel

机译:关系整合:对威廉·辛克尔的回应

获取原文
       

摘要

In this essay, I respond to Schinkel’s recent statement that ‘any claim and practice that concerns ‘integration’ should be the object of research, rather than the project of research’ (2018, p. 8). Although I agree with Schinkel that there are problematic practices of integration research, I do not agree that integration cannot be used as an analytical concept with heuristic value. In his critical analysis of how ‘integration’ is (ab)used as a political project, Schinkel seems to claim that there is no way to think of integration outside this problematic discourse. I argue that the concept of relational integration enables us to do just that by solving the most fundamental conundrum presented in his critique: that the concept of integration exempts ‘non-migrants’, and places migrants outside society.
机译:在本文中,我回应了Schinkel最近的声明,即``任何涉及``整合''的主张和实践都应作为研究的对象,而不是研究项目''(2018年,第8页)。尽管我同意Schinkel的观点,即集成研究存在问题,但我不同意集成不能用作具有启发式价值的分析概念。在对“整合”如何(不被)用作政治项目进行批判性分析时,辛克尔似乎声称,除了这个有问题的论述之外,没有办法思考整合。我认为,关系整合的概念使我们能够通过解决他的批评中提出的最根本的难题来做到这一点:整合概念免除了“非移民”,并将移民置于社会之外。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号