首页> 外文期刊>Coatings >Comparison of Single-Layer and Double-Layer Anti-Re?ection Coatings Using Laser-Induced Damage Threshold and Photothermal Common-Path Interferometry
【24h】

Comparison of Single-Layer and Double-Layer Anti-Re?ection Coatings Using Laser-Induced Damage Threshold and Photothermal Common-Path Interferometry

机译:使用激光诱导损伤阈值和光热共通干涉法对单层和​​双层抗反射涂层的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

The dielectric thin-?lm coating on high-power optical components is often the weakest region and will fail at elevated optical ?uences. A comparison of single-layer coatings of ZrO2, LiF, Ta2O5, SiN, and SiO2 along with anti-re?ection (AR) coatings optimized at 1064 nm comprised of ZrO2 and Ta2O5 was made, and the results of photothermal common-path interferometry (PCI) and a laser-induced damage threshold (LIDT) are presented here. The coatings were grown by radio frequency (RF) sputtering, pulsed direct-current (DC) sputtering, ion-assisted electron beam evaporation (IAD), and thermal evaporation. Test regimes for LIDT used pulse durations of 9.6 ns at 100 Hz for 1000-on-1 and 1-on-1 regimes at 1064 nm for single-layer and AR coatings, and 20 ns at 20 Hz for a 200-on-1 regime to compare the //ZrO2/SiO2 AR coating.
机译:高功率光学元件上的电介质薄膜涂层通常是最薄弱的区域,并且在光通量升高时会失效。比较了ZrO2,LiF,Ta2O5,SiN和SiO2的单层涂层以及在1064 nm处优化的由ZrO2和Ta2O5组成的抗反射(AR)涂层,并进行了光热共路径干涉法的测量结果(PCI)和激光诱发的损伤阈值(LIDT)出现在这里。通过射频(RF)溅射,脉冲直流(DC)溅射,离子辅助电子束蒸发(IAD)和热蒸发来生长涂层。 LIDT的测试方案使用的脉冲持续时间为100赫兹时9.6 ns的脉冲持续时间,对于单层和AR涂层在1064 nm处为1000-on-1和1-on-1方案,在200 Hz时为20 Hz时为20 ns来比较// ZrO2 / SiO2 AR涂层。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号