...
首页> 外文期刊>Cogent Medicine >Comparison of intermittent drainage of ascites and diuretic therapy for cirrhosis patients with tense ascites
【24h】

Comparison of intermittent drainage of ascites and diuretic therapy for cirrhosis patients with tense ascites

机译:肝硬化紧张性腹水患者间歇性腹水引流与利尿剂治疗的比较

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective: Ascites is one of the most frequent complications of cirrhosis. Our study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of the intermittent drainage of ascites for HBV-related cirrhosis patients with tense ascites. Material and methods: A total of 2,169 HBV-related, decompensated liver cirrhosis inpatients were screened from January 2009–January 2014. Of them, 112 cases were eligible, among whom 55 patients (treated group) were administered paracentesis with central venous catheter and drained of 1–2?L ascites every 1 or 2?days (PCVC therapy). The remaining 57 patients served as controls (control group). Results: Compared with the baseline, the level of mean arterial pressure (MAP) in the control group markedly declined (82.27?±?8.36?mm?Hg vs. 91.25?±?10.82?mm?Hg, p ?=?0.000), and the levels of MAP (79.14?±?10.30?mm Hg vs. 90.53?±?10.97?mm?Hg, p ?=?0.000) and hemoglobin (99.29?±?16.78?g/L vs. 107.55?±?21.80?g/L, p ?=?0.028) in the treated group dropped significantly. There were no significant differences in the levels of creatinine, sodium, eGFR, incidence of complications , weight loss, improvement rate, urine output and dosage of albumin between the two groups. The hospitalization time of the treated group was longer (21.49?±?13.34?days vs. 16.56?±?9.07?days, p ?=?0.025), and the amount of furosemide used in the treated group was greater than that used in the control group (47.72?±?18.53?mg vs. 27.99?±?13.32?mg, p ?=?0.000). Conclusions: Cirrhosis patients with tense ascites who received PCVC therapy showed decreased levels of Hb and MAP, but did not induce renal dysfunction. The efficacy of PCVC therapy is not superior to diuretic treatment.
机译:目的:腹水是肝硬化最常见的并发症之一。我们的研究旨在探讨间歇性腹水引流对乙肝相关性肝硬化性腹水患者的疗效和安全性。材料和方法:从2009年1月至2014年1月,共筛查了2169例HBV相关的失代偿性肝硬化住院患者。其中112例符合条件,其中55例(治疗组)接受了中心静脉穿刺穿刺术导管,每1或2天(1-2天)排干1-2?L腹水(PCVC治疗)。其余57例作为对照组(对照组)。结果:与基线相比,对照组的平均动脉压(MAP)水平显着下降(82.27±±8.36?mm?Hg与91.25±±10.82?mm?Hg, p?=?0.000),MAP(79.14?±?10.30?mm Hg与90.53?±?10.97?mm?Hg,p?=?0.000)和血红蛋白(99.29?±?16.78)处理组中的Δg/ L相对于107.55Δ±Δ21.80μg/ L,p <= 0.028)显着下降。两组之间的肌酐,钠,eGFR水平,并发症发生率,体重减轻,改善率,尿量和白蛋白剂量没有显着差异。治疗组的住院时间更长(21.49±±13.34?天vs. 16.56±±9.07?天,p?=?0.025),并且治疗组中速尿的使用量大于对照组中使用的剂量为(47.72±±18.53μmgvs.27.99±±13.32μmg,p≤0.000)。结论:接受PCVC治疗的肝硬化腹水紧张患者表现出Hb和MAP水平降低,但未诱发肾功能不全。 PCVC治疗的疗效并不优于利尿剂治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号