...
首页> 外文期刊>ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research >Clinical outcomes and health care costs combining metformin with sitagliptin or sulphonylureas or thiazolidinediones in uncontrolled type 2 diabetes patients
【24h】

Clinical outcomes and health care costs combining metformin with sitagliptin or sulphonylureas or thiazolidinediones in uncontrolled type 2 diabetes patients

机译:不可控制的2型糖尿病患者将二甲双胍与西他列汀或磺脲类或噻唑烷二酮类药物合用的临床结果和医疗保健费用

获取原文
           

摘要

Objectives: To compare clinical outcomes and health care costs across three cohorts of uncontrolled diabetic patients who initiated treatment with one of the following: sulphonylureas (SU), thiazolidinediones (TZD) or sitagliptin (SITA). Materials and methods: We performed a retrospective study based on a linkage between administrative and laboratory databases maintained by three Italian local health units. The index period ranged from July 2008–June 2010. Patients were treatment-na?ve to either SU, TZD, or SITA, but they were already treated with other oral hypoglycemic agents. Demographics and clinical characteristics were assessed at baseline. Adherence was measured by the medication possession ratio and adherent was defined a patient with a medication possession ratio of 80% or greater. We used a Poisson regression model to estimate the risk ratios for disease-related hospitalizations that occurred during the 18-month follow-up period. The total annual costs included all the pharmacological treatments and the direct costs due to hospitalizations and outpatient services. Results: We identified 928 patients treated with SU, 330 patients treated with TZD, and 83 patients treated with SITA. SITA patients were significantly younger and with fewer previous hospital discharges. The baseline mean glycated hemoglobin level was 8.1% for SU, 8.0% for TZD, and 8.3% for SITA patients. SITA-na?ve patients resulted more adherent than the SU- and TZD-na?ve patients (79.5% versus 53.2% and 62.8%, respectively; P <0.001). The SU and TZD group showed a significant increased risk of disease-related hospitalizations compared with the SITA group (the unadjusted rate was 10.42 and 7.16 per 100 person-years versus 1.64 per 100 person-years, P =0.003; compared with SU, the adjusted incidence rate ratio for SITA was 0.21, P =0.030). The total annual costs per patient were €972 for SITA, €706 for SU, and €908 for those treated with TZD. Conclusion: Uncontrolled diabetic patients who initiated – as a second-line therapy in addition to metformin – treatment with SITA, compared to those who initiated treatment with SU or TZD, showed a reduced risk of disease-related hospitalizations. The total annual costs per patient were not significantly different among the three groups.
机译:目的:比较开始使用以下药物之一进行治疗的三组未控制的糖尿病患者的临床结局和医疗保健费用:磺脲类药物(SU),噻唑烷二酮类药物(TZD)或西他列汀(SITA)。材料和方法:我们根据意大利三个地方卫生部门维护的行政数据库和实验室数据库之间的联系进行了回顾性研究。索引期为2008年7月至2010年6月。患者初次接受SU,TZD或SITA治疗,但已接受其他口服降糖药治疗。在基线评估人口统计学和临床​​特征。通过药物占有率来测量依从性,并且将依从性定义为药物占有率为80%或更高的患者。我们使用Poisson回归模型来估计在18个月的随访期内发生的疾病相关住院的风险比。年度总费用包括所有药物治疗以及因住院和门诊服务而产生的直接费用。结果:我们确定了928例接受SU治疗的患者,330例TZD治疗的患者和83例SITA治疗的患者。 SITA患者明显年轻,以前出院的次数较少。 SU的基线平均糖化血红蛋白水平为8.1%,TZD为8.0%,SITA患者为8.3%。 SITA初次治疗的患者比SU和TZD初次治疗的患者依从性更高(分别为79.5%,53.2%和62.8%; P <0.001)。与SITA组相比,SU和TZD组显示出与疾病相关的住院风险显着增加(未经调整的比率为每100人年10.42和7.16,而每100人年1.64的未调整率,P = 0.003;与SU相比, SITA的调整后发病率比为0.21,P = 0.030)。 SITA的每位患者的年度总费用为972欧元,SU的为706欧元,而TZD治疗的患者为908欧元。结论:与开始接受SU或TZD治疗的患者相比,开始接受SITA治疗(除二甲双胍以外的二线治疗)的糖尿病患者,其与疾病相关的住院风险降低。在三组中,每位患者的年度总费用没有显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号